Not really surprising that this is a MEG botch.I genuinely cannot believe this tornado was missed; I've found 9.98 (basically 10) miles of verifiable damage corroborated with KGWX data from this singular tornado alone. Way to go MEG. It's getting to the length where I might have to try and find a photograph of it.
View attachment 54458
I'm really frusturated about this more than anything and re-sent it in to MEG with a bit of a more strongly-worded email given this absolutely should not be undocumented. It's not really their fault; I just don't know how a tornado of this length is unable to be confirmed.
There is something structurally off with MEG as a whole. I’m not sure if it’s office culture, but the fact they’re still dropping the ball on anything to do with tornados 15 years later isn’t surprising. From forecasting and AFDs, to warnings and emergencies, to surveying, they are really below par.








