• Welcome to TalkWeather!
    We see you lurking around TalkWeather! Take the extra step and join us today to view attachments, see less ads and maybe even join the discussion.
    CLICK TO JOIN TALKWEATHER

Significant Tornado Events

Hello everyone. For my first post here I thought I better come with something good so here it is.
My unseen video stills from Lake City/Monette Arkansas 12/10/21.
I was CLOSE during the early stages, easily within a half a mile or less. (Lucky/blessed to be alive)
I Didn't comprehend the violent and tragic magnitude of this event until days later.
 

Attachments

  • F4Griq8XwAEaSV7.jpeg
    F4Griq8XwAEaSV7.jpeg
    80.1 KB · Views: 0
  • FLAzy9WXIAgZypi.jpeg
    FLAzy9WXIAgZypi.jpeg
    53.9 KB · Views: 0
  • FLAzy7kXEAEgOfv.jpeg
    FLAzy7kXEAEgOfv.jpeg
    23.1 KB · Views: 0
  • FLAzy5UX0AYsjn8.jpeg
    FLAzy5UX0AYsjn8.jpeg
    46.6 KB · Views: 0
  • FjpKs3RaEAAJ2FK (1).jpeg
    FjpKs3RaEAAJ2FK (1).jpeg
    85.7 KB · Views: 0
  • FjpKs26WQAINboj.jpeg
    FjpKs26WQAINboj.jpeg
    62.3 KB · Views: 0
Hello everyone. For my first post here I thought I better come with something good so here it is.
My unseen video stills from Lake City/Monette Arkansas 12/10/21.
I was CLOSE during the early stages, easily within a half a mile or less. (Lucky/blessed to be alive)
I Didn't comprehend the violent and tragic magnitude of this event until days later.
Welcome and thanks! These are terrifying yet amazing
 
Screenshot 2025-10-15 10.47.23 AM.png
FYI, I'm working on an April 27, 2011 media archival Google site at the moment (surprised this hasn't been done yet!); I'll post the link here once I've updated it to a point where there's a substantial amount of media included.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2025-10-15 10.48.55 AM.png
    Screenshot 2025-10-15 10.48.55 AM.png
    29 KB · Views: 0
  • Screenshot 2025-10-15 10.48.54 AM.png
    Screenshot 2025-10-15 10.48.54 AM.png
    38.4 KB · Views: 0
  • Screenshot 2025-10-15 10.48.52 AM.png
    Screenshot 2025-10-15 10.48.52 AM.png
    21.2 KB · Views: 0
Last edited:
View attachment 47351
FYI, I'm working on an April 27, 2011 media archival Google site at the moment (surprised this hasn't been done yet!); I'll post the link here once I've updated it to a point where there's a substantial amount of media included.
Oh wow, yeah. I had thought about creating a URL for tornado data, but not any specific event. I look forward to seeing it when it's done!
 
These are supposedly photos of the wall cloud of the Lake Chilhowee/Great Smoky Mountain EF4 from 4/27/11. These were posted on Reddit, so take it with a grain of salt.

View attachment 47305

View attachment 47306
First one is entirely legit, as looking for 4/27/11 media on FB, (I was a contributor to new videos like the Bridgeport one, but really finding a writers block eque regarding methods to find them) I stumbled across it and can find the original post if you want too.

Second one, I haven't seen it so can't have a opinion on whether it is or not. Looks a bit different in all aspects though.
 
Before i joined this forum, some of my 4/27/11 "resurfacing" got onto this forum. Perhaps my holy grail is these photos of the Hackleburg tornado, remnants. These didn't get onto the forum, a video of Bridgeport taken by Vicky West Westmoreland (which i FALSELY attributed to Hackleburg in its early days) got on. Very intense video no doubt! The DAT cut up two paths and these photos gave credible evidence to what Tornado Talk suggested about two tornadoes. I'm not sure if these photos were recognised by the office, or they used the AMS meeting that showed a lack of a TDS during this time.
 

Attachments

  • the-end-of-the-phil-campbell-hackleburg-tornado-proof-v0-zev2f9bmo5xd1.jpg
    the-end-of-the-phil-campbell-hackleburg-tornado-proof-v0-zev2f9bmo5xd1.jpg
    6 KB · Views: 0
  • the-end-of-the-phil-campbell-hackleburg-tornado-proof-v0-clf9lx8mo5xd1.jpg
    the-end-of-the-phil-campbell-hackleburg-tornado-proof-v0-clf9lx8mo5xd1.jpg
    22 KB · Views: 0
Before i joined this forum, some of my 4/27/11 "resurfacing" got onto this forum. Perhaps my holy grail is these photos of the Hackleburg tornado, remnants. These didn't get onto the forum, a video of Bridgeport taken by Vicky West Westmoreland (which i FALSELY attributed to Hackleburg in its early days) got on. Very intense video no doubt! The DAT cut up two paths and these photos gave credible evidence to what Tornado Talk suggested about two tornadoes. I'm not sure if these photos were recognised by the office, or they used the AMS meeting that showed a lack of a TDS during this time.
I only know of one photo from Bridgeport at the moment, I'm assuming this is the one you're talking about:
2011_Bridgeport_EF4_tornado.jpg
I put it on the Wikipedia article several months ago.
 
Before i joined this forum, some of my 4/27/11 "resurfacing" got onto this forum. Perhaps my holy grail is these photos of the Hackleburg tornado, remnants. These didn't get onto the forum, a video of Bridgeport taken by Vicky West Westmoreland (which i FALSELY attributed to Hackleburg in its early days) got on. Very intense video no doubt! The DAT cut up two paths and these photos gave credible evidence to what Tornado Talk suggested about two tornadoes. I'm not sure if these photos were recognised by the office, or they used the AMS meeting that showed a lack of a TDS during this time.
Very nice find on that. I remember seeing your post on r/tornado if that was you. I don’t have an account nor post since that board (along with Reddit and social media as a whole) can be a cesspool with zero insightful contribution. However, this one blew my mind. Hopefully with you being a regular poster on here now, more of your 4/27/11 finds can show up here!
 
First one is entirely legit, as looking for 4/27/11 media on FB, (I was a contributor to new videos like the Bridgeport one, but really finding a writers block eque regarding methods to find them) I stumbled across it and can find the original post if you want too.

Second one, I haven't seen it so can't have an opinion on whether it is or not. Looks a bit different in all aspects though.
Re: the first picture. That’s a really cool find. The time of day in the photo tracks as well since that tornado happened around evening time.

I’ve seen a photo supposedly of the New Harmony EF4 tornado, but honestly I can’t even see it in the picture because of the terrain. Have you found any on that storm?
 
I’ve seen a photo supposedly of the New Harmony EF4 tornado, but honestly I can’t even see it in the picture because of the terrain. Have you found any on that storm?
Is it the "green"-tinted one? People always say that video shows the tornado itself, but I just don't see it.
 
Yes, that’s the one. To me it just looks like a low-cloud base thunderstorm in mountainous terrain.

Edit: here is the photo in question:
View attachment 47360
That's a pretty fuzzy copy of the OG:
On another note, going back to a post I made a long time ago...




it's so small

I'm pretty sure the tornado is there, but it is TINY and you have to jack the contrast quite a bit to see it. Just above center.
 
Very nice find on that. I remember seeing your post on r/tornado if that was you. I don’t have an account nor post since that board (along with Reddit and social media as a whole) can be a cesspool with zero insightful contribution. However, this one blew my mind. Hopefully with you being a regular poster on here now, more of your 4/27/11 finds can show up here!
Yeah, that was me haha! I'm glad you appreciate the posts. I'm currently in a bit of a writer blocks with finding these videos. Many methods don't seem to work as they did two years ago.

Regarding the New Harmony tornado, the only thing I've stumbled upon is the wall cloud of it. That photo there, i mightve seen before but i haven't searched for 4/27 media in a bit. Hackleburg media seems to be my specialty, I have many photos of Hackleburg including the wall cloud before it dropped near Hamilton and a close range photo of it a few minutes after touchdown similar to Lily Hartley's video. I might be pinching at things, but i think this photo HAS the "dead man walking" structure with it. Hopefully I can find more media very soon!
 

Attachments

  • 468413347_10162573039761983_1879381899638822735_n.jpg
    468413347_10162573039761983_1879381899638822735_n.jpg
    21.1 KB · Views: 0
  • 468400620_10162573041911983_2038334458497956171_n.jpg
    468400620_10162573041911983_2038334458497956171_n.jpg
    16.6 KB · Views: 0
  • 515584594_10238722329621931_8258302488505820727_n.jpg
    515584594_10238722329621931_8258302488505820727_n.jpg
    39.1 KB · Views: 0
  • 466466338_10162056477955667_1473903501355459072_n.jpg
    466466338_10162056477955667_1473903501355459072_n.jpg
    17.3 KB · Views: 0
I'd heard Brian Peters and Tim Coleman describe two tornadoes in progress as the storm approached Cordova during their live play-by-play for 33/40, but as far as I can tell no separate tornado was ever confirmed by survey in this area.

Just from this image, the tornadoes look too far apart and too similar in size to be a "main/satellite" pair, and it also doesn't look like an anticyclonic companion. Visually, it bears the strongest resemblance to a simple handoff/cycle, with the left tornado occluded and soon to dissipate (Peters/Coleman did report one of the tornadoes lifting not long after their observations began) and the right tornado recently formed and will intensify and continue through Cordova, Sumiton, Blountsville, etc.

If confirmed this would have split the track into separate EF3 and EF4 tornadoes; although per radar signatures the first tornado was extremely intense and likely violent during much of its track from just northeast of Reform to somewhere just south or southeast of Berry.

Speaking of, I think the Wikipedia article photo for this tornado must be captioned wrong; since, officially, it wasn't at EF4 intensity until past Cordova.
There was indeed a continuous centerline throughout the entire main suspect area, so it is likely this was just a chaotic satellite period.
 
Some more stuff from Joplin...

Another angle of the home from photos #3 and #5 in my previous post. Interesting application of a 5 here, not exactly swept clean, though it was anchored. Maybe this is a case where some of the debris on the slab was from neighboring homes?
Joplin-damage-foundation.jpg

Aerial of damage northeast of St. Johns. The two swept homes left of S Connor Ave (road at bottom center) were rated EF5.


Block foundation, anchored home swept clean on the other side of S Connor Ave
Joplin-EF5-damage-home3.jpg
438145362_18299370697080027_5561375363077149684_n.jpg


Aerial of the EF5 rated home on Main St
Joplin-EF5-aerial.jpg
 
Some more stuff from Joplin...

Another angle of the home from photos #3 and #5 in my previous post. Interesting application of a 5 here, not exactly swept clean, though it was anchored. Maybe this is a case where some of the debris on the slab was from neighboring homes?
View attachment 47375

Aerial of damage northeast of St. Johns. The two swept homes left of S Connor Ave (road at bottom center) were rated EF5.


Block foundation, anchored home swept clean on the other side of S Connor Ave
View attachment 47396
438145362_18299370697080027_5561375363077149684_n.jpg


Aerial of the EF5 rated home on Main St
View attachment 47387

Where was it I heard that Joplin may not have been correctly rated with its EF5 rating. I don’t think it was EF4 but I saw it somewhere.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AJS
Where was it I heard that Joplin may not have been correctly rated with its EF5 rating. I don’t think it was EF4 but I saw it somewhere.
That's the ASCE report that has been discussed here many times.

Joplin's EF4+ damage swath was about a quarter mile wide. And to say that 135MPH (EF2) winds can level entire blocks of frame homes - some of them well built and anchor bolted - is a crock of s**t.

That study (along with others) is what got the ball rolling to set an impossibly high, engineering-only standard (e.g. a house has to be built like a fortress) for an EF5 rating to be assigned. And we all know that's why the 'EF5 drought' even happened.

The bottom line: Joplin was an EF5. Period.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top