• Welcome to TalkWeather!
    We see you lurking around TalkWeather! Take the extra step and join us today to view attachments, see less ads and maybe even join the discussion.
    CLICK TO JOIN TALKWEATHER

Enhanced Fujita Ratings Debate Thread

In that WeatherBrains episode, I think the idea of "who cares about the ratings" was nicely put to rest as well by Rick Smith and Kim Klockow. The people that suffered through these tornadoes want to know just how bad it was, and, like it or not, no other method than the scale can wrap that up in one, succinct number.
I forgot which panelist made the point, it may have been Kim, but they said there are communities where these F5s/EF5s are wrapped up in the town’s identity and are now part of their culture. When I hear Xenia, Guin, Phil Campbell etc. I think of those tornados. Hell, here in Kentucky, I can be amongst people who have zero clue about this stuff and the first mention of Brandenburg elicits a “the town that tornado swept into the river in the 70s?”
 
I forgot which panelist made the point, it may have been Kim, but they said there are communities where these F5s/EF5s are wrapped up in the town’s identity and are now part of their culture. When I hear Xenia, Guin, Phil Campbell etc. I think of those tornados. Hell, here in Kentucky, I can be amongst people who have zero clue about this stuff and the first mention of Brandenburg elicits a “the town that tornado swept into the river in the 70s?”
Yes, an F5/EF5 is absolutely a monument for these towns and their survivors, particularly the ones that recovered.
 
I forgot which panelist made the point, it may have been Kim, but they said there are communities where these F5s/EF5s are wrapped up in the town’s identity and are now part of their culture. When I hear Xenia, Guin, Phil Campbell etc. I think of those tornados. Hell, here in Kentucky, I can be amongst people who have zero clue about this stuff and the first mention of Brandenburg elicits a “the town that tornado swept into the river in the 70s?”
And they say that the residents don't really care but there was Mayfield residents that were heavily intrigued into the rating process and how such. Residents are just as intrigued into the rating process, and like you said this is now a part of the town and a part of the residents who survived. Absolutely, bang on
 
I find it interesting that multiple poorly anchored ranch style subfloor homes have been rated EF4 this year. Yet the homes from matador are still stuck with the high end EF3 rating.
Despite one of them essentially disappearing with a cracked foundation walls, shredded tree’s, and bare soil scoured grass field. With vehicles thrown and mutilated.
 
I find it interesting that multiple poorly anchored ranch style subfloor homes have been rated EF4 this year. Yet the homes from matador are still stuck with the high end EF3 rating.
Despite one of them essentially disappearing with a cracked foundation walls, shredded tree’s, and bare soil scoured grass field. With vehicles thrown and mutilated.
Yeah, Matador PROBABLY deserves some look back but I'm not too sure of it...
 

Attachments

  • matador_tornado_11.jpeg
    matador_tornado_11.jpeg
    158.4 KB · Views: 0
  • images (1).jpeg
    images (1).jpeg
    7.7 KB · Views: 0
  • images (2).jpeg
    images (2).jpeg
    8 KB · Views: 0
It has been a really good couple days for tornado science. I can't believe how quickly NWS Grand Forks managed to flip everything on its head. Feels like a total culture shift.

Also here's the full Tim Marshall interview



Pretty hilariously, the interviewer admits to trying to push Tim Marshall into giving a substantial answer about re rating previous tornadoes.

IMG_3283.jpeg
 
Last edited:
I’m a little confused about the Mayfield situation. I’ve seen two very different wind speed estimates for the train cars in Barnsley. While I have always had skepticism about some of Ethan Moriarty’s work, especially regarding his more recent take on Rochelle 2015, I can’t ignore that he pretty much produced the same results of the Enderlin survey well before it was finalized and released. As a result, I’m inclined to believe his methodology at least when it comes to wind speeds derived from objects being moved.

Kind of a bummer to see Mayfield essentially tossed back into the proverbial “no EF5” bin so quickly though.
 
I’m a little confused about the Mayfield situation. I’ve seen two very different wind speed estimates for the train cars in Barnsley. While I have always had skepticism about some of Ethan Moriarty’s work, especially regarding his more recent take on Rochelle 2015, I can’t ignore that he pretty much produced the same results of the Enderlin survey well before it was finalized and released. As a result, I’m inclined to believe his methodology at least when it comes to wind speeds derived from objects being moved.

Kind of a bummer to see Mayfield essentially tossed back into the proverbial “no EF5” bin so quickly though.
Not necessarily in the "no EF-5" bin yet.

We do have some reports of vehicles being lofted hundreds of yards (Atleast 100 yards, plausibly more) by the Mayfield Tornado, and while I haven't found an exact length of the cars being lofted, as well as a few other DI's like the water tower, it is possible that these could show EF-5 winds. Also, I am working on refining my calculations (For example, the Mayfield train car vs the Tuscaloosa truss bridge). Until then, Mayfield is in the "Possible EF-5" bin.

I do agree with trusting Ethan over myself though. I'm still learning the math but I'm getting better at it!
 
I’m a little confused about the Mayfield situation. I’ve seen two very different wind speed estimates for the train cars in Barnsley. While I have always had skepticism about some of Ethan Moriarty’s work, especially regarding his more recent take on Rochelle 2015, I can’t ignore that he pretty much produced the same results of the Enderlin survey well before it was finalized and released. As a result, I’m inclined to believe his methodology at least when it comes to wind speeds derived from objects being moved.

Kind of a bummer to see Mayfield essentially tossed back into the proverbial “no EF5” bin so quickly though.
I have a feeling one of the big questions the recent paper answered was how elevation change and time of exposure (to wind) play into the calculations. The study combined tens of thousands of actual tornado model runs to simulate every possible wind scenario. My theory is the reason the output of the basic physics calculations were so similar to the new algorithm in Enderlin was because the terrain was so flat.

If flat terrain lowers the required wind speeds as much as the difference between Ethan and @Ozonelayer's calculations say it do, it definitely means the situation with incorrect ratings might not be quite as extreme as we thought. I do really want Ethan's opinions on this paper though. I've been trying to share it with him on Twitter lol.
 
Not necessarily in the "no EF-5" bin yet.

We do have some reports of vehicles being lofted hundreds of yards (Atleast 100 yards, plausibly more) by the Mayfield Tornado, and while I haven't found an exact length of the cars being lofted, as well as a few other DI's like the water tower, it is possible that these could show EF-5 winds. Also, I am working on refining my calculations (For example, the Mayfield train car vs the Tuscaloosa truss bridge). Until then, Mayfield is in the "Possible EF-5" bin.

I do agree with trusting Ethan over myself though. I'm still learning the math but I'm getting better at it!
We really need more info about that oil drum fertilizer tank that was thrown 3/4th of a mile!
 
Last edited:
We really need more info about that oil drum that was thrown 3/4th of a mile!
Yep!
Also I have Identified a few of the vehicles that were lofted. One was a Ford F 150, and another as a Ram 1500 (Similar to what Lake City lofted half a mile earlier this year.)

Im going to review how Ethan does it, then apply that math and see what results I get. I trust Ethan a lot more than I trust myself, hell I'm not even entirely sure if I got Tuscaloosa right. I definitely didn't match Ethan with the Mayfield Train Car though.

By the way, sorry to ask, but If you have any images of the oil drum it's help a ton!
 
Yep!
Also I have Identified a few of the vehicles that were lofted. One was a Ford F 150, and another as a Ram 1500 (Similar to what Lake City lofted half a mile earlier this year.)

Im going to review how Ethan does it, then apply that math and see what results I get. I trust Ethan a lot more than I trust myself, hell I'm not even entirely sure if I got Tuscaloosa right. I definitely didn't match Ethan with the Mayfield Train Car though.
Ok I've committed Tim Marshall's body to the cause. Assuming Tim Marshall is 6 ft tall, the cylinder is about 2 Tim Marshalls tall, and 1.3 Tim Marshalls Wide. That's 12'x8'.

1759894922906.jpeg

The container weighed 15 tons according to @buckeye05, and was thrown 3/4ths of a mile (660 Tim Marshalls). Is this enough for a rough estimate assuming the terrain was completely flat?
 
We really need more info about that oil drum that was thrown 3/4th of a mile!
Wait, two questions:

1.) Mayfield threw an oil container 3/4 of a mile!? I had no idea this occurred. Where did it happen?? Would love some details on this.

2.) Was it an oil tank or an oil drum? Those are two very different things. Oil tanks can be massive steel containers weighing dozens of tons. An oil drum on the other hand is literally just a metal barrel, typically about 4 feet tall and could probably be tossed that distance by an EF2 or EF3.
 
Ok I've committed Tim Marshall's body to the cause. Assuming Tim Marshall is 6 ft tall, the cylinder is about 2 Tim Marshalls tall, and 1.3 Tim Marshalls Wide. That's 12'x8'.

View attachment 47017

The container weighed 15 tons according to @buckeye05, and was thrown 3/4ths of a mile (660 Tim Marshalls). Is this enough for a rough estimate assuming the terrain was completely flat?
Ooooooh that. That was Vilonia, not Mayfield. It was also a fertilizer tank, not an oil drum.
 
Ok I've committed Tim Marshall's body to the cause. Assuming Tim Marshall is 6 ft tall, the cylinder is about 2 Tim Marshalls tall, and 1.3 Tim Marshalls Wide. That's 12'x8'.

View attachment 47017

The container weighed 15 tons according to @buckeye05, and was thrown 3/4ths of a mile (660 Tim Marshalls). Is this enough for a rough estimate assuming the terrain was completely flat?
That is quite possibly the greatest feat of lofting something outside of Greensburg I have ever seen. And yes that is enough.
 
Back
Top