AJS
Member
- Messages
- 2,370
- Location
- Houston Texas.
Didn’t John Robinson intentionally not mention the E Wicker Street home during the Vilonia? From what I can remember, Marshall didn’t even survey that home and wasn’t made aware of it during the survey.Sorry, but I disagree with a good portion of this. Tim Marshall has said some questionable things and did survey multiple tornadoes with questionable ratings, but his reputation is largely undeserved as he isn’t directly responsible for those ratings. What people seem unable to understand is that the bad calls you mention were almost entirely independently made by people in local WFO survey teams, and NOT by Tim Marshall himself. His surveys are supplemental and go along with the ratings decided by the WFO surveys. Tim’s survey of Vilonia actually subtly suggests dissent if you read it closely, and he never actually surveyed the EF5 areas of damage in Vilonia. Also, the person responsible for that mess is a guy named John Robinson, not Tim Marshall.
For Goldsby, the person who botched that survey is Kiel Ortega, not Marshall (btw that isn’t ground scouring in that photo, it’s a section of ground where grass isn’t growing along the perimeter of the foundation likely due to pooling of rain water).
Matador was ruined by the lead surveyor at NWS Lubbock, whose name escapes me right now.
Also EF4 for Mayfield is not egregious. Best shot at EF5 was in Bremen, and there wasn’t a single poured “slab and bolts” construction home in that area. Best construction was in Cambridge Shores, but there was no EF5 contextual damage there. Those two factors have to overlap.
Anyway you get the idea. Do I agree with everything he says? No way. Should Moore and Jarrell be the standard? Absolutely not. Does Tim catch way too much blame from people who don’t do enough digging and research to find the specific people on survey teams who made terrible decisions independently of Marshall’s surveys? Absolutely. The way I see it, guy is largely a scapegoat for tornado damage weenies who don’t see who the real main offenders are: incompetent local WFO survey teams who don’t know where the line between EF4 and EF5 damage lays, and couldn’t give you the reasoning behind previous EF5 ratings if their lives depended on it. They are the ones making the calls.