I totally disagree. Ukraine has been one of the best investments of US taxpayer dollars in decades, IMO - no boots on the ground and the almost complete degradation of one of the largest conventional armies ever assembled that was our greatest geopolitical foe - all by sending Ukraine (mostly) our almost outdated stuff while we replace it with newer versions. The vast majority of the "money for Ukraine" has been spent here - a ton of it in Huntsville and Anniston.
econofact.org
I am normally in alignment with Mike on most political issues, and usually opposite your position, but in this case I couldn't agree more.
I was going to make a post earlier today saying a number of the same things.
We degraded the Russian military.
Gained valuable insight into next gen warfare (we were behind China/Iran on drones before the conflict) as well as detailed intelligence and actionable insights about the performance of Russian and Iranian weaponry.
Rotated out older material, weapons, and ammunition that would've eventually gone to the scrapyard. Now all those items are being modernized or replaced. DoD didn't previously have the budget for it.
The DIB (Defense Industrial Base) modernized, restarted, or initiated lines of production for numerous weapons, munitions, and logistical items. This infrastructure had become extremely decrepit and inefficient. It is why we STILL cannot outproduce Russia even though we have an economy that is levels more productive, innovative, and larger than the Russian economy. It takes time to stand up lines of production. We were not prepared for a conflict with a near peer or peer adversary. We're still not but we're a whole hell of a lot better off than we were in 2021.
Additional members were brought into NATO like Finland. Europe has increased defense spending significantly. It's still not enough, but the war for Europe to do so whereas Trump's previous threats had little impact. Outside of a couple of countries...NATO is more united and unquestionably stronger than it was in 2021. The amount of training, intelligence gathering, and exercises that NATO has performed because of the war is priceless.
I could go on and on. We've given very little in the way of straight cash transfers to Ukraine. Zelenskyy was the one who initially broached using a deal for minerals to pay back previous aide and secure additional future aide. Then the current admin decided to shake him down like a mob boss instead of working out a fair and palatable deal.
I actually expected Trump to be the one with hatred toward Ukraine, considering his first impeachment and other related issues, but it actually appears to be Vance who absolutely loathes Ukraine. I've been stunned to see Vance morph from a Never Trump figure into someone who seems to take positions more extreme than both Elon and Trump. I don't know what happened to the guy. He seems to have an absolutely massive chip on his shoulder. Trump is Trump. We all know how he is. Vance's anger, trolling, and smarmy attitude and actions are something darker. Quite frankly, I think Vance is magnitudes more dangerous than Donald Trump. Something is not right with JD.
In closing, I do think Zelenskyy made a mistake today while meeting with Vance and Trump. He should've known better -- especially with how important the moment was for his country's future. I know it was extremely hard to put up with the barbs, embrace of Russian propaganda, and outright appeasement of Putin, but he needed to suck it up and withstand it. That said, with a normal administration not made of two men with paper-thin egos, it wouldn't have even registered in the media. Vance's reaction was completely inappropriate and wholly unnecessary. It's like he was waiting for an opportunity to blast Zelenskyy. Again, Vance has deep hatred in his heart for Ukraine and I have no idea why that is.