TH2002
Member
- Messages
- 4,966
- Reaction score
- 11,086
- Location
- California, United States
- Special Affiliations
- SKYWARN® Volunteer
The El Reno tornado denuded and partially debarked some trees and caused vehicle damage of a caliber that really isn't seen in less-than-violent tornadoes:Does anyone have imagery of impressive damage from the 2013 El Reno tornado? I have never seen a single picture from that event that comes close to a violent intensity (with exception to the Twistex car, which is pretty violent vehicle damage) which leads me to believe that
1. It's an extraordinarily overrated tornado in intensity, especially by the general public.
2. Extreme windspeeds (>300 mph) are capable of occurring in tornadoes that are not capable of inflicting violent damage on the ground.
3. Forward speeds of a tornado can determine the type of damage it will inflict, not just the intensity of it. (This point is very nuanced and likely true, in my eyes.)
I want to know if I have the wrong ideas about this, or simply haven't seen the higher end damage this thing did. I honestly am against this thing receiving an EF5 rating and don't even think I'd support it being granted EF4, and I am definitely in the minority from what I have seen on the internet in that regard.
Also, just because I believe it's extremely overrated in intensity doesn't mean I believe it wasn't one of the most dangerous tornadoes to chase of all time. It makes complete sense to me why people were caught so off-guard by this thing, and even chasers passed away from it. I definitely wouldn't put it into the most powerful tornadoes ever recorded but I most certainly would put it as a top 3 most dangerous tornado to chase that we have seen.
While I don't think the storm caused enough violent damage to earn an EF5 rating, the most intense vegetation and vehicle damage is nothing inconsistent with EF4 imo.








