- Messages
- 2,835
- Location
- Smithville MS
yep and sometimes the more underrated threat. Because flooding is not as sexy per se as tornadoes.Flooding often manages to be the sneaky threat with a lot of these systems.
yep and sometimes the more underrated threat. Because flooding is not as sexy per se as tornadoes.Flooding often manages to be the sneaky threat with a lot of these systems.
Come over to Texas. We've got room. Just stay away from the borderNo where far, just down the road to something smaller
Hail and Wind Threats for Thursday:
From Andy.
Yes, would decrease low level shear plus decrease low level instabilityWouldn’t the occlusion tend to temper the high-end tornado risk on Friday?
Yeah I was looking at that, it has some crossing over one another in south Arkansas, awaiting NWS of Fayetteville new discussion06Z HRRR rakes southern Arkansas with supercells Thursday evening...in line with thinking based on the forecast environment there over the last several days.
This is definitely good news, though not entirely surprising. Just a few days ago modelling was showing a broad-based trough and concomitantly a significant tornado threat on Friday. However, as has been often the case in recent years, within the short term modelling rapidly trended toward a more amplified, occluded solution. This further justifies my earlier caution about the potential “ceiling” for this event in terms of multiple EF2+ tornado families. The occlusion might also help constrict the severe-wind threat to some extent as well, which is also good news. In fact the severe-wind threat looks to be less than I expected just a day or so ago. The large-scale synoptics on the models would need to change significantly today and tomorrow in order for Friday to end up being much more significant.Yes, would decrease low level shear plus decrease low level instability
we are now approaching the timeframe that models should getting a better idea if there is an occlusion. I have seen some hints, such as the very round isobars and the slower movement of the surface low. Right now, models are suggestion the occlusion doesn't happen, but I know this kind of setup usually leads to one...we shall seeThis is definitely good news, though not entirely surprising. Just a few days ago modelling was showing a broad-based trough and concomitantly a significant tornado threat on Friday. However, as has been often the case in recent years, within the short term modelling rapidly trended toward a more amplified, occluded solution. This further justifies my earlier caution about the potential “ceiling” for this event in terms of multiple EF2+ tornado families. The occlusion might also help constrict the severe-wind threat to some extent as well, which is also good news. In fact the severe-wind threat looks to be less than I expected just a day or so ago. The large-scale synoptics on the models would need to change significantly today and tomorrow in order for Friday to end up being much more significant.