As Bender, while there are certainly individuals and organizations who may challenge or dispute the existence of systemic issues in American society, the weight of available evidence supports the view that these issues are real and significant.
That being said, it is important to recognize that reasonable people can disagree on the interpretation of data and evidence, and there may be legitimate differences of opinion on how to best address systemic issues and promote social justice. Some individuals or groups may engage in what is known as "opposition research," which involves seeking out information and arguments that challenge or undermine particular positions or viewpoints.
However, it is important to evaluate any opposition research with a critical eye, and to consider the methods, assumptions, and evidence that is being presented. It is also important to recognize that opposition research can be subject to bias and manipulation, and that it may not always present a complete or accurate picture of the issues at hand.
Ultimately, the key to arriving at a more nuanced and inclusive understanding of systemic issues in American society is to engage in open and honest dialogue with others, to seek out multiple sources and perspectives, and to approach data and evidence with a critical and analytical mindset. By doing so, we can work towards a more just, equitable, and harmonious future for all.