WeathermanLeprechaun
Member
Pretty much thinking the same, in order to really prove that church is a EF5 DI, we'd need plenty of information and I'm not even sure if that information is known or was considered for the building.I wish it was guaranteed. You’re going to hate hearing this, but as others have mentioned, Tim Marshall actually rated that church EF4. I will say that’s always sat weird with me and I’ve always thought of that church as a possible EF5 candidate, but I also don’t have enough specific information on it to dispute the official rating. What I do know is that photos show severe corrosion of the church’s anchor plates and bolts. That will have some impact, but to what extent I’m not sure. I do think there’s a way to get Mayfield the EF5 rating it deserves, but it may come down to root ball displacements of calculations of objects being thrown, rather than structural damage. Heck, though maybe that one house in Bremen would be enough too at this stage if Jim LaDue’s recent video presentation means anything.
Yeah this is what I was talking about. As you can see it’s not just the bolts, it’s the actual anchor plates too, which actually appear brittle enough to have chipped during their failure. Rust has been responsible for multiple engineering disasters, like the Mianus River Bridge collapse, but with that said, that was still by all appearances a very sturdy building with very thick brick walls, and I don’t know the extent of impact the corrosion had.
I think, regardless without the church, there is still a few evident areas of interest looking forward for Mayfield being a EF5