Hope y'all are ready for more missed surveys because of Trump and co's bullsh*t.
IIRC they only had one tornado in their CWA. Still a seriously annoying situation.
Hope y'all are ready for more missed surveys because of Trump and co's bullsh*t.
I know I'm not the expert but I really don't see this happening at all.Imagine a scenario where we literally get thrown back to the pre-1970 era of tornado damage analysis, where ground surveys basically did not exist - would you say the risk is very real that this could happen across the country?
They had more than that almost certainly from the QLCS.IIRC they only had one tornado in their CWA. Still a seriously annoying situation.
For 1), the biggest problem I see is that there is far less of a safety net for tech problems now with the cancelling of contracts, which could absolutely impact warning dissemination. For 2), I don't think that will happen to the fullest degree, but there probably will be more tornadoes missed or rated EFU during this era than previously.Okay, some serious questions…
1. What impact do you think the recent staffing cuts could have on warning issuance and dissemination?
2. Imagine a scenario where we literally get thrown back to the pre-1970 era of tornado damage analysis, where ground surveys basically did not exist - would you say the risk is very real that this could happen across the country?
"I believe this is what the kids tend to call 'talking street'."Interesting dialect used here.
View attachment 38887
Interesting dialect used here.
View attachment 38887
Okay, some serious questions…
1. What impact do you think the recent staffing cuts could have on warning issuance and dissemination?
2. Imagine a scenario where we literally get thrown back to the pre-1970 era of tornado damage analysis, where ground surveys basically did not exist - would you say the risk is very real that this could happen across the country?
Not trying to be “that guy”, but I disagree. Apart from the apartment office and a few block foundation homes, I have not seen any buildings totally slabbed. I’ve also seen intense tree damage in Selmer, but nothing stripped clean of all bark. I do think there is some scouring and granulation, but idk how much of that muddy appearance is true scouring.Based on the videos and images I've seen, I believe the Selmer tornado has better chance of getting an EF5 rating.
Multiple well-built homes swept away with no debris in the immediate area, but the other construction-based DIs are even more extreme than Lake City - granulated debris, steel frames (likely of mobile homes) twisted and bent like pretzels. We can't know the quality of the slabbed homes just from the images, but these indicators appear to be extreme and could push it into the EF5 category. Just my two cents.
They have 6 paths they are reviewing.IIRC they only had one tornado in their CWA. Still a seriously annoying situation.
I appreciate it @joshoctober16 . Looks like it missed the town directly hence no fatalities.base on what im seeing on radar and damage this seems to be the likely path of the lake city tornado
View attachment 38885
Hope y'all are ready for more missed surveys because of Trump and co's bullsh*t.
It was much closer to monette than this. Hit right next to the nursing home just barely missing it. Destroying a row of silo’sbase on what im seeing on radar and damage this seems to be the likely path of the lake city tornado
View attachment 38885
One of the best explanations of what’s going on in a tornado in layman’s terms by a tv meteorologist I have seen
all im thinking about is this image
View attachment 38888