- Messages
- 1,786
- Location
- Norman, OK
Straight up Nazi rhetoric re: those who have autism from RFK Jr.
Straight up Nazi rhetoric re: those who have autism from RFK Jr.
He's very thinly veiling his support for eugenics.I have autism, so here’s my take FWIW:
Nazi rhetoric? No.
A man who has a very poor understanding of autism, how it affects people, and just generally shouldn’t be the Secretary of Health and Human Services? Yes.
He's very thinly veiling his support for eugenics.
RFK is not a Nazi. He’s not calling for the forced institutionalization or euthanization of autistic people or anyone else with mental disabilities. Saying otherwise reminds me of that quote from SpongeBob:Eugenics were absolutely a key part of Nazi rhetoric and the state went after and killed the mentally impaired just as they did the Jews, upwards of 250,000 people total. Kennedy's dehumanizing comments would fit right in there.
What the hell is even the difference in this administration? It's all for the same cause.RFK is not a Nazi. He’s not calling for the forced institutionalization or euthanization of autistic people or anyone else with mental disabilities. Saying otherwise reminds me of that quote from SpongeBob:
“He poisoned our water supply, burned our crops and delivered a plague unto our houses!”
“He did?”
“No, but are we just gonna wait around until he does?”
I think you two are confusing stupidity with malice.
You can be a Nazi without calling for those things. Also, RFK very much does want to send folks with alcohol and drug disorders to "wellness farms" where they can get better by growing tomatoes or something: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/18/health/rfk-addiction-farms.htmlRFK is not a Nazi. He’s not calling for the forced institutionalization or euthanization of autistic people or anyone else with mental disabilities. Saying otherwise reminds me of that quote from SpongeBob:
“He poisoned our water supply, burned our crops and delivered a plague unto our houses!”
“He did?”
“No, but are we just gonna wait around until he does?”
I think you two are confusing stupidity with malice.
Im surprised this hasn't been brought up further; I never knew a world of pre-9/11, I never got to see that time. But, my parents and close associates certainly did; it's left me rather sad, knowing that things didnt used to be like this.Call me a conspiracy theorist or whatever, but this realization just hit me like a brick: the federal government has had a major power trip going ever since 9/11, and it continues regardless of which major party is in power:
the unconstitutional Patriot Act and spying on US citizens - "it's to keep you safe"
the unconstitutional REAL ID act - "it's to keep you safe"
unconstitutional gun laws in many states like California and Illinois - "it's to keep you safe"
unconstitutional lockdowns and vaccine mandates during Covid - "it's to keep you safe"
unconstitutional arrests and deportations of legal residents for having the "wrong" opinions about Israel and proposed unconstitutional deportations of US citizens - "it's to keep you safe"
Hmmm...
"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." -Benjamin Franklin
I can’t read the article because (go figure) it’s paywalled, but it admittedly peaked my interest. Does RFK support sending people to those farms with or without the patient’s consent?You can be a Nazi without calling for those things. Also, RFK very much does want to send folks with alcohol and drug disorders to "wellness farms" where they can get better by growing tomatoes or something: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/18/health/rfk-addiction-farms.html
Just curious - how do you and UpperLevelLOL define the term “Nazi”?What the hell is even the difference in this administration? It's all for the same cause.
People who align with Stephen Miller and this administration nowadays, because they are behaving like Nazis.I can’t read the article because (go figure) it’s paywalled, but it admittedly peaked my interest. Does RFK support sending people to those farms with or without the patient’s consent?
Just curious - how do you and UpperLevelLOL define the term “Nazi”?
(Not asking to be a smarta**, genuinely curious what your criteria is)
This time, there is no such violence. The only reason it is being invoked is to make it easier to use the military against immigrants and (eventually) the greater civilian population. It is not a martial law declaration...
A US judge has said he could hold the Trump administration in contempt of court for "wilful disregard" of an order to halt the departure of deportation flights carrying more than 200 people to El Salvador last month.
The administration had invoked a 227-year-old law meant to protect the US during wartime to carry out the mass deportation.
"The Court does not reach such conclusion lightly or hastily; indeed, it has given Defendants ample opportunity to rectify or explain their actions. None of their responses has been satisfactory," federal judge James Boasberg wrote...
-- Source
...
Stanford Law School professor Robert Weisberg, who teaches criminal procedure, said Boasberg’s claim that the government flagrantly violated his order is “very convincing.”
“This looks so sound to me that I think it will be difficult to win a reversal, which means we may have a standoff,” he said.
Weisberg said he is concerned that the showdown between the judge and administration could move the government even closer to a constitutional crisis.
“I’m supposed to say, because everybody else does, that we have to be careful about using the term ‘constitutional crisis.’ It means too many things, it’s overused,” he said. “That aside, what the country has been waiting for ... some with happy anticipation, is for a flat-out refusal to obey a legal court order. This is pretty close.”
...
The lawsuit challenges Trump evoking the International Emergency Economic Powers Act to enact the tariffs, arguing the act had never been used for such levies and such powers rest with the US Congress.
The lawsuit cites multiple times from rulings by the US Supreme Court against the Biden administration in its quest to forgive student debt, noting the high court called Biden's manoeuvres a "transformative expansion" of presidential authority.
Newsom said if the Supreme Court is "consistent, then this lawsuit is a lock" for the state.
The act has never been used to issue tariffs by any president, congressional research shows.
While California is the first state to file legal action against the Trump administration over the levies, several other lawsuits filed by small businesses and a civil rights group have similarly challenged Trump's authority on the matter....
-- Source
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Trump administration’s claim that it can’t do anything to free Kilmar Abrego Garcia from an El Salvador prison and return him to the U.S. “should be shocking,” a federal appeals court said Thursday in a blistering order that ratchets up the escalating conflict between the government’s executive and judicial branches.
A three-judge panel from the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals unanimously refused to suspend a judge’s decision to order sworn testimony by Trump administration officials to determine if they complied with her instruction to facilitate Abrego Garcia’s return.
-- Source