He didn't address the Sutherland Springs Church shooting as anti-Christian, either, despite the shooters atheist background and increasingly anti-Christian rhetoric.
I don't think the man knows how the Constitution or the process to amend it works. But, this isn't the first direct violation of the Constitution he has made...
You didn't have any context when you posted that video.
Why don’t you look at the debate that followed and then what the Supreme Court has decided.
To ensure former slaves have the liberties granted from the bill of rights.
It's also funny how people who say we should defend the constitution exactly how it is written, are quick to say you can overrule it with an EO. It goes both ways. People are biased.
Bingo. Don't like it, introduce an amendment. It is difficult to actually do that, as it should be, so it is easier to write executive orders and let the Supreme Court take it on.
Indeed. The 2nd amendment is straight forward, albeit the nomenclature is not something you'd hear much today. Regarding the 2nd and 14th, the debate shouldn't be what the amendment means, it should be how it impacts people today with the change in technology, transportation, communication etc... Anyone suggesting those two amendments are open to interpretation are wrong in my opinion. Of course it gets complicated when you throw in mental health & felonies - neither of which change the understanding of the original doctrine though.
You didn't read the background did you. Jacob Wohl is dumb.
