When this is over I think a thread about discussing it and expectations would be great. To me it was a Forecasted Convective Amplification Deficiency and no disrespect to those hurt and killed and lost everything. I will say this. 2 high risks and not one major tornado in MS. Memphis has been Moderate and high risk and not 1 warning in last 2 weeks. My thoughts and prayers are with those that have lost loved ones and homes.
TDS?The SECOND 2 mile-wide TDS of the day...
It's also very close to the radar. But you could be right.
In densely populated metro Atlanta, no less. Today should have no association with the word "Forecasted Convective Amplification Deficiency".We currently have a potentially violent tornado in progress. Let's talk about Forecasted Convective Amplification Deficiency stuff later.
Tornadic debris signature. Correlation coefficient products detect it.TDS?
When this is over I think a thread about discussing it and expectations would be great. To me it was a Forecasted Convective Amplification Deficiency and no disrespect to those hurt and killed and lost everything. I will say this. 2 high risks and not one major tornado in MS. Memphis has been Moderate and high risk and not 1 warning in last 2 weeks. My thoughts and prayers are with those that have lost loved ones and homes.
Tornado Debris SignatureTDS?
Totally agree. I just believe SPC uses high risk and moderate way to often anymore.You're right. It's a discussion for another time. But, as I previously stated, 04/27 has inured us to what a tornado outbreak and a moderate/high risk should produce.
People need to understand that 04/27 is not something that's going to happen every other severe wx threat. I grew up with the original Super Outbreak being an event that few thought would ever be repeated. It took nearly 40 years, but it happened again. What we're seeing right now is absolutely what you'd expect given the SPC forecast.
One of the worst debris balls I've seen in a long time.Massive debris ball coming into Newnan. This is really, really bad.
View attachment 7692
Looking at it from TATL instead of KFFC, I don’t think my statement is correct. Don’t really see signs of it cycling from there