Brax
Member
GA always overpreforms in low cape high shear events. And shear appears to be in abundance tomorrow....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No you are correct and it's been a part of the discussion for days. The thing is when you have explosive instability it can counter act low helicity, just as very high helicity can counter act low cape in winter time systems. In this environment 200-300 helicity is plenty to put down long track tornadoes.
Another thing is some of the models may be veering the winds too much. Don't be surprised to see the winds back toward the dry line.
No you are correct and it's been a part of the discussion for days. The thing is when you have explosive instability it can counter act low helicity, just as very high helicity can counter act low cape in winter time systems. In this environment 200-300 helicity is plenty to put down long track tornadoes.
Another thing is some of the models may be veering the winds too much. Don't be surprised to see the winds back toward the dry line.
Very likely, particularly in Alabama. The latest update already pulled it westward some from where it was this morning.Do y'all foresee the moderate risk being expanded northwestward over time?
Do y'all foresee the moderate risk being expanded northwestward over time?
Yeah to a non weather geek moderate doesn't sound like the very serious threat that it is.It situations like this that irks me that the word "moderate" is used to define risk. It was good when you had three risk levels, but now with five it needs to be renamed "Significant" to properly note a level "four" risk.
It situations like this that irks me that the word "moderate" is used to define risk. It was good when you had three risk levels, but now with five it needs to be renamed "Significant" to properly note a level "four" risk.
Yeah, I've run into the same problem trying to explain the five-tiered system to people. I understand the purpose of the five-tiered system and personally find it useful, but I think the three-tiered system was a lot less ambiguous and confusing for people who don't follow such things closely.It situations like this that irks me that the word "moderate" is used to define risk. It was good when you had three risk levels, but now with five it needs to be renamed "Significant" to properly note a level "four" risk.
From people I've talked to, yes, it does. Obviously the plural of anecdote isn't data, etc, but I think it is confusing to some people.To someone not into weather, I have to wonder if "enhanced" actually sounds worse than "moderate."
Still in hopes of things just not coming perfectly together....anyone got the latest model data from the NAM or others?