Why didn't Epstein notify the families of the victims of the plea deal he arranged?
I have no idea. You're trying to deflect the story away from the dems and towards Trump. Bill Clinton is quaking in his boots right now I can promise you that.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Why didn't Epstein notify the families of the victims of the plea deal he arranged?
I mentioned Bill Clinton in one of my earlier posts about this...I have no idea. You're trying to deflect the story away from the dems and towards Trump. Bill Clinton is quaking in his boots right now I can promise you that.
Where does Barr come up with this stuff?
Barack Obama presided over a nearly $1 trillion reduction in the budget deficit, from $1.4 trillion to $585 billion. By the end of his first term, Donald Trump, who bankrupted 5 casinos, will have almost entirely reversed that with a deficit of $1.1 trillion by the end of 2020.
Trump shouldn’t have added to the deficit. Dems shouldn’t give healthcare to illegals.The same guy and party that passed a law that fined Americans for not buying health insurance and now that same party wants to give it free to illegal aliens.
Trump shouldn’t have added to the deficit. Dems shouldn’t give healthcare to illegals.
The budget he submitted had huge deficits.Trump does not control the purse strings.
You do realize that Trump has also taken some plane rides with Epstein...
Why should states get more electoral votes and more house members for having more illegal aliens?
This woman will literally do and say anything to advance her career.
Trump tries to run the country like he has run his businesses... borrow other peoples money and then when you fail, play the bankruptcy card to bail your butt out of the debt you owe. Play the good ole boy game with your rich cronies but screw the common people. Corruption personified.Trump does not control the purse strings.
This is no longer the law as it was amended in the 14th amendment but that wording still makes you correct. Still highlights the need for immigration reform.Because Article I, Section II of the United States Constitution requires apportionment to be based on [the] "whole Number of free Persons."
All arguments for/against apportionment being based only on citizens or legal residents are irrelevant. The Constitution requires it, and if anyone wants to change it they'll need a Constitutional amendment to do so.
Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three fifths of all other Persons. The actual Enumeration shall be made within three Years after the first Meeting of the Congress of the United States, and within every subsequent Term of ten Years, in such Manner as they shall by Law direct.