• Welcome to TalkWeather!
    We see you lurking around TalkWeather! Take the extra step and join us today to view attachments, see less ads and maybe even join the discussion.
    CLICK TO JOIN TALKWEATHER

Severe WX Severe Weather 4/24-4/26

12z model runs...wow. Ceiling is very high on this event. Wouldn't surprise me to see at least one day go HIGH.

Regarding failure modes, I think the slow-moving yet dynamic nature of this system will prevent consecutive day busts on Sun/Mon. If Sunday busts, Monday is a bona fide outbreak. If Sunday doesn't bust, well then Sunday is likely an outbreak with some potential leftover for Monday.

Monday honestly looks more ominous to me due to the widespread nature of favorable parameters over a larger, more populated area.

Peak season is here, and she's in supreme form...
 
12z model runs...wow. Ceiling is very high on this event. Wouldn't surprise me to see at least one day go HIGH.

Regarding failure modes, I think the slow-moving yet dynamic nature of this system will prevent consecutive day busts on Sun/Mon. If Sunday busts, Monday is a bona fide outbreak. If Sunday doesn't bust, well then Sunday is likely an outbreak with some potential leftover for Monday.

Monday honestly looks more ominous to me due to the widespread nature of favorable parameters over a larger, more populated area.

Peak season is here, and she's in supreme form...
Think we see another 30 percent go out in morning . For Monday’s threat
 
12z model runs...wow. Ceiling is very high on this event. Wouldn't surprise me to see at least one day go HIGH.

Regarding failure modes, I think the slow-moving yet dynamic nature of this system will prevent consecutive day busts on Sun/Mon. If Sunday busts, Monday is a bona fide outbreak. If Sunday doesn't bust, well then Sunday is likely an outbreak with some potential leftover for Monday.

Monday honestly looks more ominous to me due to the widespread nature of favorable parameters over a larger, more populated area.

Peak season is here, and she's in supreme form...
I can already see and smell the Reed Timmer tweet from here.

"TORNADO OUTBREAK LIKELY; REPEAT OF THE SUPER OUTBREAK OF 2011 POSSIBLE WITH GORILLA HAIL!!"
 
12z model runs...wow. Ceiling is very high on this event. Wouldn't surprise me to see at least one day go HIGH.

Regarding failure modes, I think the slow-moving yet dynamic nature of this system will prevent consecutive day busts on Sun/Mon. If Sunday busts, Monday is a bona fide outbreak. If Sunday doesn't bust, well then Sunday is likely an outbreak with some potential leftover for Monday.

Monday honestly looks more ominous to me due to the widespread nature of favorable parameters over a larger, more populated area.

Peak season is here, and she's in supreme form...
Yeah I mean for Sunday I'm seeing 0-3km SRH values up to 692m2/s2 and 0-1km up to 512 m2/s2 which is never good to see. Just gotta have that CAP break.
 
Yeah I mean for Sunday I'm seeing 0-3km SRH values up to 692m2/s2 and 0-1km up to 512 m2/s2 which is never good to see. Just gotta have that CAP break.


Side note, and apologies for going off topic, but I found my screenshot of the sounding from Trey's video on the Super Outbreak of 2011; the SRH values on this are something I'm just so amazed by. Just absolutely unreal.

EDIT: For those that can't see, the 0-3km values are close to 1200 m2/s2, and the 0-1km values are around 940 m2/s2.
 


Side note, and apologies for going off topic, but I found my screenshot of the sounding from Trey's video on the Super Outbreak of 2011; the SRH values on this are something I'm just so amazed by. Just absolutely unreal.

EDIT: For those that can't see, the 0-3km values are close to 1200 m2/s2, and the 0-1km values are around 940 m2/s2.


It's hard to wrap your head around, and one of the reasons I get so frustrated when systems get compared to it every spring. The dynamics behind 4/27/11 are basically the stuff of fantasy.
 


Side note, and apologies for going off topic, but I found my screenshot of the sounding from Trey's video on the Super Outbreak of 2011; the SRH values on this are something I'm just so amazed by. Just absolutely unreal.

EDIT: For those that can't see, the 0-3km values are close to 1200 m2/s2, and the 0-1km values are around 940 m2/s2.

Right on the thermal boundary in northern Alabama and northeast Mississippi.
 
Can't zoom in to look at though?
I’ve seen that sounding enough in my own research to know it’s the RAP proximity sounding from Hackleburg and Smithville.

West-Central Alabama (think the Cordova area) had more extreme instability parameters than depicted in this sounding with mesoanalysis STP values running up to nearly 18.
 
I am so turning that into an alarm ringtone for my phone

Don't forget "Back (voice rises two octaves in pitch) UPPPPPP!!!!!"

That actually was his Facebook profile picture for a while.
 
Thought this was worth mentioning: Someone in one of these threads mentioned the comparison between this year’s April pattern and April 2011 a few weeks ago. This month has followed that year quite well to this point in terms of where our severe threats have been, even if the severity and magnitude of the threats we’ve seen so far has been much lower (April 2011, after all, is literally the all-time month).

Not saying we’re going to see anything approaching the end of that month in the coming days, but this coming setup is best potential we’ve had for a higher-end outbreak sequence in a while.
 
This is one of those setups where the signal is clearly there at the synoptic scale, and that’s why confidence in something happening is pretty high. The global guidance has been fairly consistent run to run with a negatively tilted trough ejecting into the Plains, strong lee cyclogenesis, and a broad warm sector with quality moisture return. That’s not a messy or disorganized look, it’s a classic late April pattern that usually produces at least one legitimate severe weather day. The overall structure of the system, especially the timing of the trough and the strength of the low level response, supports a scenario where the atmosphere is primed across a large area rather than just a narrow corridor.

Sunday still jumps off the page in terms of raw environment. You’re looking at MLCAPE in the 3000–4000 J/kg range, deep layer shear around 45–60 knots, and a strong low level wind field with backed surface flow near the dryline and any warm front intersection. On top of that, there’s a stout elevated mixed layer in place, which is both the reason the ceiling is so high and the main limiting factor. The environment ahead of the dryline is about as classic as it gets for a Plains setup, which is why people keep calling it a loaded gun type look. The issue isn’t whether the atmosphere can support significant severe weather, because it clearly can, the issue is whether storms actually initiate in the right place and at the right time. The GFS in particular has been showing relatively limited QPF despite strong large scale ascent, which points toward capping concerns. At the same time, that’s a known bias, especially in these EML driven setups where it tends to hold the cap too long. If that cap holds, you end up with a frustrating underperforming day where nothing really takes advantage of the environment. But if it breaks in a focused window, even briefly, storms would likely become rapidly organized and discrete, and with shear vectors largely perpendicular to the dryline and strong low level hodographs, that would favor supercells capable of producing significant severe, including long track tornado potential. You don’t need a lot of storms in an environment like that, one or two sustained supercells could end up verifying the entire risk.

Monday looks more like a downstream continuation of the pattern, with stronger forcing and a broader spatial footprint. The environment still supports severe weather, with MUCAPE generally in the 2000–3000 J/kg range, around 40 knots of bulk shear, and a wide warm sector extending from Louisiana and Mississippi up into Tennessee and Kentucky. The difference here is that initiation is much less of a concern, and the setup leans more toward widespread convection rather than isolated storms. That brings its own tradeoffs, because while the ceiling might not be quite as extreme as Sunday in a pure sense, the overall threat becomes more reliable and covers a larger area. Storm mode becomes more of a question, with potential for a mix of supercells and organized lines, but the parameter space still supports all hazards. The big wildcard with Monday is how much Sunday influences it. If Sunday produces widespread convection, that could work over the atmosphere and limit instability somewhat on Monday. If Sunday underperforms or stays capped, then Monday could inherit a more undisturbed environment and end up with a higher ceiling than it might otherwise have.

The way the pattern is evolving, this really looks like a multi day severe setup where at least one day is likely to produce a significant event. Sunday has the higher ceiling and the more classic look for discrete supercells, but it’s conditional on the cap breaking. Monday has a lower ceiling in a vacuum, but a much higher floor in terms of storm coverage and overall impact. It wouldn’t be surprising at all to see Sunday end up as a more localized but potentially high end day if storms can initiate cleanly, while Monday ends up being a broader, more widespread severe event affecting a larger population. Right now, Sunday still stands out as the day where if everything comes together it could really go big, especially near the dryline and any boundary intersections, but Monday is arguably the more dependable threat given the stronger forcing and larger scale support. Overall, the ceiling on this entire setup is very high, it’s just a matter of which day actually takes full advantage of the environment.
 
Needless to say, it does feel like we’re starting to move away from the super conditional setups we’ve been dealing with lately. This pattern has a much stronger large scale signal with better forcing and a broader warm sector, so even if one day underperforms, the overall system still looks capable of producing a more realized severe threat. It’s not completely free of conditional concerns, especially with capping still in play Sunday, but compared to a lot of earlier setups this year, the ceiling is higher and the margin for failure looks smaller.
 
This is one of those setups where the signal is clearly there at the synoptic scale, and that’s why confidence in something happening is pretty high. The global guidance has been fairly consistent run to run with a negatively tilted trough ejecting into the Plains, strong lee cyclogenesis, and a broad warm sector with quality moisture return. That’s not a messy or disorganized look, it’s a classic late April pattern that usually produces at least one legitimate severe weather day. The overall structure of the system, especially the timing of the trough and the strength of the low level response, supports a scenario where the atmosphere is primed across a large area rather than just a narrow corridor.

Sunday still jumps off the page in terms of raw environment. You’re looking at MLCAPE in the 3000–4000 J/kg range, deep layer shear around 45–60 knots, and a strong low level wind field with backed surface flow near the dryline and any warm front intersection. On top of that, there’s a stout elevated mixed layer in place, which is both the reason the ceiling is so high and the main limiting factor. The environment ahead of the dryline is about as classic as it gets for a Plains setup, which is why people keep calling it a loaded gun type look. The issue isn’t whether the atmosphere can support significant severe weather, because it clearly can, the issue is whether storms actually initiate in the right place and at the right time. The GFS in particular has been showing relatively limited QPF despite strong large scale ascent, which points toward capping concerns. At the same time, that’s a known bias, especially in these EML driven setups where it tends to hold the cap too long. If that cap holds, you end up with a frustrating underperforming day where nothing really takes advantage of the environment. But if it breaks in a focused window, even briefly, storms would likely become rapidly organized and discrete, and with shear vectors largely perpendicular to the dryline and strong low level hodographs, that would favor supercells capable of producing significant severe, including long track tornado potential. You don’t need a lot of storms in an environment like that, one or two sustained supercells could end up verifying the entire risk.

Monday looks more like a downstream continuation of the pattern, with stronger forcing and a broader spatial footprint. The environment still supports severe weather, with MUCAPE generally in the 2000–3000 J/kg range, around 40 knots of bulk shear, and a wide warm sector extending from Louisiana and Mississippi up into Tennessee and Kentucky. The difference here is that initiation is much less of a concern, and the setup leans more toward widespread convection rather than isolated storms. That brings its own tradeoffs, because while the ceiling might not be quite as extreme as Sunday in a pure sense, the overall threat becomes more reliable and covers a larger area. Storm mode becomes more of a question, with potential for a mix of supercells and organized lines, but the parameter space still supports all hazards. The big wildcard with Monday is how much Sunday influences it. If Sunday produces widespread convection, that could work over the atmosphere and limit instability somewhat on Monday. If Sunday underperforms or stays capped, then Monday could inherit a more undisturbed environment and end up with a higher ceiling than it might otherwise have.

The way the pattern is evolving, this really looks like a multi day severe setup where at least one day is likely to produce a significant event. Sunday has the higher ceiling and the more classic look for discrete supercells, but it’s conditional on the cap breaking. Monday has a lower ceiling in a vacuum, but a much higher floor in terms of storm coverage and overall impact. It wouldn’t be surprising at all to see Sunday end up as a more localized but potentially high end day if storms can initiate cleanly, while Monday ends up being a broader, more widespread severe event affecting a larger population. Right now, Sunday still stands out as the day where if everything comes together it could really go big, especially near the dryline and any boundary intersections, but Monday is arguably the more dependable threat given the stronger forcing and larger scale support. Overall, the ceiling on this entire setup is very high, it’s just a matter of which day actually takes full advantage of the environment.
We've seen so many setups in the Plains where parameters appear pristine but storms just don't materialize that it seems like a conditional threat even with the strong kinematics and hefty late-April thermodynamics. Under-convection is a persistent problem in Plains setups and over-convection tends to be a limiting factor in Deep South ones, though the latter has the Dixie Alley aptitude to work with kinematics despite limited thermodynamics and poor storm spacing. I'm hoping it turns into a slopfest on Sunday to perhaps lessen some of the brunt of activity on Monday, although even if you have an upscaling QLCS leftover, the general synoptic pattern for Monday would still support plenty of potential for significant severe. That said, it may not dampen the threat as much as we'd hope, especially depending on the speed of convective progression. Will be pretty hard to come out the other side of this sequence without at least one day of significant severe weather.
 
Back
Top