Ozonelayer
Member
Given where the Union Center tornado passed over, I unfortunately think there is still a good bit of damage to be seen. The roads it hit were littered with isolated homes and we have yet to see damage from Union Center itself.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Union Center is also in the WFO that almost rated Boscobel EF4, so I wouldn’t be too sure.Hearing the Union Center house was anchored with concrete nails instead of proper bolts. If this is true, I don’t think an EF4 rating is likely. We’ll find out soon enough.
Replying to my own post: here are some damage pics from that tornado. The damage is a lot less intense than I thought it might be given the intensity of the velocity couplet, as well as the debris signature that came with that.https://www.jsonline.com/picture-gallery/news/2026/04/15/tornado-damages-lisbon-presbyterian-church-in-sussex-and-other-properties/89618545007/Are there any details on the potential Lisbon/Sussex tornado from yesterday? There was a CC drop with that storm, but I haven’t seen anyone share any damage updates from that storm here.
Can’t agree with this more. I was that other user lol. When the FV3 is showing a messy, over-convected warm sector, then you know storm mode has trended into major fly in the ointment territory. That’s exactly what happened.One last comment on this topic and I’ll shut up. I think it comes down to a weird stigma about calling b*st. Yes, premature b*st calls are annoying, but sometimes it’s ok to call it like it is. I’d go as far as to say I find it more annoying when we are 90% through an underperforming high-ceiling event with next to no red dots on the SPC map and nothing but linear slop on radar and someone mentions that the event has underperformed only to be met with a bunch of “How dare you say that! How egregiously irresponsible! This isn’t over yet!” type responses, even when it’s very clear it’s just not gonna happen.
I’ll never forget the morning of the Tylertown EF4, which was an event with a very, VERY high and historic ceiling. I recall that me and another user pointed out how multiple CAMs and radar trends were trending away from the modeled violent tornado producing long-track supercell swarm, and trending towards a still significant, but sloppier and more joe average Dixie outbreak. My god it was like we were accused of summoning the devil himself, and were basically told to zip it, disregard any hints at a downtrend, and “lock in” (lol). Guess what happened? A still significant but rather sloppy average Dixie outbreak that produced one violent tornado and a smattering of sigtors. The way it played out pretty much mirrored the CAM solutions. All we were saying was that this event may not reach the insane ceiling, and even though we were correct, people were NOT having it.
It’s one thing to jump down someone’s throat for calling bust, but it’s gotten to the point where pointing out limiting factors and downtrends causes people to get very reactive. I think it’s silly and I refuse to bend to that weird stigma. When an event does not reach its ceiling of potential, people should be able to point it out without pushback.
With all of these events if people can just keep in mind things will always tend to trend towards the mean and away from the extreme events they'd be a lot less married to the extreme outcomes.Can’t agree with this more. I was that other user lol. When the FV3 is showing a messy, over-convected warm sector, then you know storm mode has trended into major fly in the ointment territory. That’s exactly what happened.
The funny thing is, we weren’t the only ones saying the set up had downtrended. I distinctly mentioned Brad Arnold’s morning pre-Chase video and Trey saying the set up had downtrended some in his morning video. Mentioning that was like kicking a hornet’s nest. “It’s now cast mode now bro” and “I don’t care what so and so is saying”.
I think the best approach when looking at set ups is to look at flies in the ointment first, then look at what the set up has going for it. I don’t think there’s any harm in pointing out trends or sloppy storm mode. The over dramatic reactions to that, like you said, are more annoying than the users who say something is a bu$t.
This was far from a bu$t. I honestly think everyone is still getting calibrated to the new hatched cig areas and what they actually correlate to in a real world event.
Cig tor seems to be a common theme now. Hatched locations use to be more rare, now it's pretty much almost anytime severe is forecastedInteresting threat today. Trey is questioning why there is a sig tore risk over the southern portion of the risk area, and then the SPC comes out and expands the sig tore risk area
Talk about an overstatement. Next time I wait for damage photos before putting in my two cents.What I really want to see is damage photos from the Mound City tornado from yesterday. From this article, it seems like it caused pretty bad damage but won't be fully rated as such due to poor construction quality (Mobile homes)
![]()
Tornado causes 'extensive' damage as it tears through southern Linn County
By Roger Sims, Journal staff [email protected] CITY – "The damage is extensive." That was the assessment of Linn County Sheriff James Akes in the wake of a tornado that ripped across southern Linn County on Monday evening.Akes in an interview Monday night said the tornado left a...www.linncountyjournal.com