• Welcome to TalkWeather!
    We see you lurking around TalkWeather! Take the extra step and join us today to view attachments, see less ads and maybe even join the discussion.
    CLICK TO JOIN TALKWEATHER

Severe Weather 2026

Spann is a pro at criticism. I'm very sure every time they need to interrupt regular coverage there's been mean tweets about him. That seems to be the case for many. Spann is a great guy and mistakes happen.

I'm going away to Paris from next Friday to Sunday, so i hope I don't miss anything particularly noteworthy next week. Hopefully not but very active pattern on the way.

Regarding 2018, that was a year where most setups verified their floor and some verified or overperformed. I think a lot forget how impressive the parameter space for 3/19/18 was. It was a intense ceiling, supporting large hail and intense tornadoes. We did verify a EF3, but a significant outbreak was expected and that isn't what happened. Mostly a hail dominant day with some tornadoes snuck inbetween. The only notable plains/rockies event of the year was 6/28/18 and 5/1/18 in Tescott. Then you had the surprise July event in Iowa that warranted a TORE. 12/1/18.

Not to be any harsh but I don't really care for tornado season forecasting. Things can change very rapidly in the ocean over these months and that's what caused last year to be a more active year than was expected for many. There's no genuine way to know how active a season will be until it happens.
 
12z GFS throws out one impressive severe weather event for the majority of the mid south and going up into the NE on the 10th. Absurd aerial coverage here if it were to verify. I won't have a say on how 3/4 - 3/6 will pan out just yet. But things are certainly there for some sort of severe weather. Those outlooks are NOT for tornadoes and that is a common misconception to the majority of the community for some reason. It is for the potential of all severe hazards. Next week might not be particularly tornadic of course, too early to say but that threat also stands for hail/wind. They are underestimated threats imo, and if yesterday told you anything about hail, it can be impactful in the right environment.

Cameron Nixon's research finds that storms can produce pretty large hail with no CAPE, all it takes is just a bare bit of instability, steep lapse rates aloft, and the storm will do the job. I've seen 4 inch hail in a general tstm risk in Texas once
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_2026-02-27-19-55-44-542.jpeg
    Screenshot_2026-02-27-19-55-44-542.jpeg
    145.1 KB · Views: 0
Spann is a pro at criticism. I'm very sure every time they need to interrupt regular coverage there's been mean tweets about him. That seems to be the case for many. Spann is a great guy and mistakes happen.

I'm going away to Paris from next Friday to Sunday, so i hope I don't miss anything particularly noteworthy next week. Hopefully not but very active pattern on the way.

Regarding 2018, that was a year where most setups verified their floor and some verified or overperformed. I think a lot forget how impressive the parameter space for 3/19/18 was. It was a intense ceiling, supporting large hail and intense tornadoes. We did verify a EF3, but a significant outbreak was expected and that isn't what happened. Mostly a hail dominant day with some tornadoes snuck inbetween. The only notable plains/rockies event of the year was 6/28/18 and 5/1/18 in Tescott. Then you had the surprise July event in Iowa that warranted a TORE. 12/1/18.

Not to be any harsh but I don't really care for tornado season forecasting. Things can change very rapidly in the ocean over these months and that's what caused last year to be a more active year than was expected for many. There's no genuine way to know how active a season will be until it happens.
Yep, I remember 3/19/18 very well. Pretty scary setup, and quite unusual for the area. Actually, though it obviously wasn't the same kind of synoptic situation, the convective evolution of the cells yesterday reminded me of it just a bit.

Also, with regard to seasonal forecasts, I think @ColdFront had a similar sentiment - ultimately there's just so many things to consider that the confounds are more numerous than the actual independent factors.
 
Cameron Nixon's research finds that storms can produce pretty large hail with no CAPE, all it takes is just a bare bit of instability, steep lapse rates aloft, and the storm will do the job. I've seen 4 inch hail in a general tstm risk in Texas once

We had a surprise elevated-supercell significant hail event in our local area just last April. Storms rolled in during the early hours of April 18th, still during the valid period of the April 17 evening outlook which had us in marginal risk, followed by barely upgrading a small portion of southeastern Wisconsin to a slight risk starting at 12Z (7 AM CDT) the 18th.

12Z-12Z 4/17 reports
12Z-12Z 4/18 reports

I was at work and we were on the air with our morning local newscast (4:30-7AM) when the EAS box in the production control room pinged for the first severe thunderstorm warning while we were in a commercial break. I was able to get in our meteorologist's ear and let him know so he could mention it first thing after the break ended; while I took the Village of Cassville, WI webcam which showed near-constant lightning over the Mississippi River as the storms crossed into southern Wisconsin. Starting shortly thereafter we were wall-to-wall for nearly the next three hours.
 

Admittedly it is a impressive ensemble presentation for so far out but things can change. Regardless, i am watching this particular day closely since the ensembles have got their face full of cake with it. Wouldn't pay too much concern just yet, but there will likely be hype with this so just watch out. Not all guaranteed at the moment. But he is right about quite the signal.

We had a surprise elevated-supercell significant hail event in our local area just last April. Storms rolled in during the early hours of April 18th, still during the valid period of the April 17 evening outlook which had us in marginal risk, followed by barely upgrading a small portion of southeastern Wisconsin to a slight risk starting at 12Z (7 AM CDT) the 18th.

12Z-12Z 4/17 reports
12Z-12Z 4/18 reports

I was at work and we were on the air with our morning local newscast (4:30-7AM) when the EAS box in the production control room pinged for the first severe thunderstorm warning while we were in a commercial break. I was able to get in our meteorologist's ear and let him know so he could mention it first thing after the break ended; while I took the Village of Cassville, WI webcam which showed near-constant lightning over the Mississippi River as the storms crossed into southern Wisconsin. Starting shortly thereafter we were wall-to-wall for nearly the next three hours.
I remember this since I woke up at 10am that morning (in Ireland) and watched those surprise big hailers take place. Hail forecasting is complicated. Was a interesting event to watch
 
From a message posted on FB by Spann four hours ago. He admitted he was wrong. Moving on...

"It likely that a small tornado moved through parts of Pinson. Trussville damage was either a weak tornado or a gustnado. NWS Birmingham will do their survey this morning. This wasn't on the bingo card for yesterday."

"I will post the survey results when they come in. There has been some pretty nasty criticism of me on social media since yesterday, which mostly was deserved. But remember, you. can't hurt my feelings; I have no feelings left to hurt after 47 years of this."
It's pretty trashy and selfish...some of the messages I've seen since his social media post. Every day, my trust in people close and far from me dwindles, even in the weather enterprise, and I have no feeling towards them. Anyways, away with the OT flood. March looks to be very active, to those who care❤️
 
To be fair, March has been a lot more active than April the last few years. I agree that first part of April should be colder than normal especially around Easter (with final frost/freeze threat for southern states as well around that time). However, after that, we should flip the pattern back mid/late April going into May. We'll see though. I have my suspicions that April will be more active than it's been the last few years.
 
To be fair, March has been a lot more active than April the last few years. I agree that first part of April should be colder than normal especially around Easter (with final frost/freeze threat for southern states as well around that time). However, after that, we should flip the pattern back mid/late April going into May. We'll see though. I have my suspicions that April will be more active than it's been the last few years.
Yeah March 2023 and 2025 were nuts. I forget 2024.
 
Back
Top