• Welcome to TalkWeather!
    We see you lurking around TalkWeather! Take the extra step and join us today to view attachments, see less ads and maybe even join the discussion.
    CLICK TO JOIN TALKWEATHER

invest 93L (40/40)

Thank you mods/admins. Your work is much appreciated.

Looks like the latest spaghetti models keep this mostly onshore. Seems appropriate with how far north that swirl was/is. Still, I dread the atmospheric rivers this will be able to pull up out of the gulf. Expecting SE flooding on this track.
1752611620433.png
 
Thank you mods/admins. Your work is much appreciated.

Looks like the latest spaghetti models keep this mostly onshore. Seems appropriate with how far north that swirl was/is. Still, I dread the atmospheric rivers this will be able to pull up out of the gulf. Expecting SE flooding on this track.
View attachment 45130
Right. I'm kinda surprised the forecast models aren't more aggressive with the total rainfall amounts because you are definitely going to have PWAT values surging to near or exceeding 3 inches. I mean I understand this isn't organized yet, but still.
 
Right. I'm kinda surprised the forecast models aren't more aggressive with the total rainfall amounts because you are definitely going to have PWAT values surging to near or exceeding 3 inches. I mean I understand this isn't organized yet, but still.
Exactly.

Couple of things about this one still giving me pause, even on this track.

1. The ground (where it isn't swamp already) is very saturated in the panhandle. There may not be a whole lot of difference between land and sea. Brown ocean effect.
2. I'm not liking how much influence this low is already throwing around. That's a healthy looking spin.
3. Dry air on it's path. Simply put - "there ain't any".

1752617223157.png

Obviously one would need a more southerly track for any RI or major shenanigans, but I'm not writing off this one having surprises and outsized impacts. The recent rain rates have been absurd - 11 inches in 4 hours in one spot in FL near Lakeland under one of these thunderstorms.
 
I mean to be honest the 12z UKMET, ICON, and Canadian from yesterday makes the most sense rainfall wise.
 

Attachments

  • ukmo-all-alms-total_precip_inch-3099200.png
    ukmo-all-alms-total_precip_inch-3099200.png
    191.5 KB · Views: 0
  • icon-all-alms-total_precip_inch-3142400.png
    icon-all-alms-total_precip_inch-3142400.png
    182.5 KB · Views: 0
  • gem-all-alms-total_precip_inch-3358400.png
    gem-all-alms-total_precip_inch-3358400.png
    191.3 KB · Views: 0
And here's the PWAT values from all the latest global models over my area valid at 21z Saturday
 

Attachments

  • gfs-deterministic-starkville-pwat-2958800.png
    gfs-deterministic-starkville-pwat-2958800.png
    64.8 KB · Views: 0
  • gem-all-starkville-pwat-2958800.png
    gem-all-starkville-pwat-2958800.png
    62.7 KB · Views: 0
  • ecmwf-deterministic-starkville-pwat-2958800.png
    ecmwf-deterministic-starkville-pwat-2958800.png
    62.6 KB · Views: 0
Dropped the station plots on there - CoC is a pain to find of course at this "strength", but at 5 it was about half way across the peninsula, looks like.
1752618851631.png
 
LOL... that very promising surface spin just spun up into S GA.
 
93L may indeed surprise us;
IMG_4688.jpeg
 
Back
Top