Kds86z
Member
- Messages
- 4,321
- Location
- Greencastle, PA
Based on what it seems the threat will be nocturnal.
6pm central now..
Based on what it seems the threat will be nocturnal.
Notice the guy who turns into a drone. Good ol Gemini.
Just to make sure I'm reading this correctly you think something like the Jarrell tornado could happen with this event?everyone please be safe if your in Oklahoma , its likely going to be a day of intense deviant hybrid tornadoes.
could very well be a day with a lot of fatalities if one forms in the wrong spot.
don't get close to these tornadoes , it could likely be similar to a jarrell / plainfield like event
View attachment 43171
View attachment 43172
sadly kind of yes.Just to make sure I'm reading this correctly you think something like the Jarrell tornado could happen with this event?
yes and no.Isn’t a hybrid tornado just a landspout that transitions into a traditional tornado? What makes those more dangerous?
I think he is saying that tornadoes will start as landspouts then latch onto any nearby supercells? I think the emphasis is less on hybrids and more on actual intense tornado possibility.Isn’t a hybrid tornado just a landspout that transitions into a traditional tornado? What makes those more dangerous?
greenfield was a transitional hybrid tornado. i think it was the only quick moving one as well.I think he is saying that tornadoes will start as landspouts then latch onto any nearby supercells? I think the emphasis is less on hybrids and more on actual intense tornado possibility.
Hybrids also aren't very different than normal tors, I think Greenfield may have started as a landspout.
I'd more be asking why particular scheme he's presenting evades scientific literature and mischaracterises certain events (like Joplin)Isn’t a hybrid tornado just a landspout that transitions into a traditional tornado? What makes those more dangerous?
note i never stated joplin was a hybrid tornado, i did state the events that had all Green were likely however (joplin had some yellow on that graph)I'd more be asking why particular scheme he's presenting evades scientific literature and mischaracterises certain events (like Joplin)
I for one think his research is awesome, and I love his outside the box thinking. Absolutely nothing wrong with it, even if it ends up being wrong.I'd more be asking why particular scheme he's presenting evades scientific literature and mischaracterises certain events (like Joplin)