Shakespeare 2016
Member
- Messages
- 1,472
- Location
- Augusta, Kansas
It does beat a lot of major to historic tornado outbreaks in terms of significant tornadoes.Been a while since we’ve had an outbreak this ferocious.
It does beat a lot of major to historic tornado outbreaks in terms of significant tornadoes.Been a while since we’ve had an outbreak this ferocious.
I’d actually say the contextual damage was enough for EF5. The damage to the concrete slab itself is very impressive too. Again, I think the only thing that keeps it from EF5 is that if we’re going by the “slab swept clean” definition, it doesn’t really apply.I can safely say that this tornado won’t make the cut for EF5. I think contextual damage and home damage just fell short of what was fully needed. It definitely gave the rating a run for its money though. Very fortunate it avoided a direct hit on those towns.
Yeah after looking back, Contextual damage was there. Just not a clean sweep like we would see in an EF5. Regardless, this really gave the rating a run for it’s money.I’d actually say the contextual damage was enough for EF5. The damage to the concrete slab itself is very impressive too. Again, I think the only thing that keeps it from EF5 is that if we’re going by the “slab swept clean” definition, it doesn’t really apply.
Some post-debris cleanup pics got posted and everyone just started second-guessing, even though it’s the same house as below. Not a clean sweep.
Apparently there is a few houses struck by tornadoes two years in a row in Paragould?
![]()
WeatherMatrix
Incredibly, several homes in Paragould, Arkansas, were hit by a second tornado in less than a year. On May 27, 2024, several houses were severely damaged by an EF-2 tornado. On Saturday, another...www.facebook.com
Been an excellent discussion in this thread. Like I said, this is one heck of an interesting tornado; even putting aside various controversies, it truly flirted with the bounds of categories in a way that shows our inherent difficulties in trying to clearly categorize such a capricious side of nature.I’d actually say the contextual damage was enough for EF5. The damage to the concrete slab itself is very impressive too. Again, I think the only thing that keeps it from EF5 is that if we’re going by the “slab swept clean” definition, it doesn’t really apply.
Some post-debris cleanup pics got posted and everyone just started second-guessing, even though it’s the same house as below. Not a clean sweep.
This home before the cleanup sort of reminds me of the well built home that was obliterated during the Matador tornado, but like above, didn’t get the full “clean sweep” of debris.I’d actually say the contextual damage was enough for EF5. The damage to the concrete slab itself is very impressive too. Again, I think the only thing that keeps it from EF5 is that if we’re going by the “slab swept clean” definition, it doesn’t really apply.
Some post-debris cleanup pics got posted and everyone just started second-guessing, even though it’s the same house as below. Not a clean sweep.
I wholeheartedly agree with you.Been an excellent discussion in this thread. Like I said, this is one heck of an interesting tornado; even putting aside various controversies, it truly flirted with the bounds of categories in a way that shows our inherent difficulties in trying to clearly categorize such a capricious side of nature.
The on-air met on KAIT was talking about that during their live coverage. Apparently it hit his house.
Is there a preliminary rating for the Paragould tornado? I can't seem to find one, just EF2 for Pocahontas to the northwest.
A tornado causing extremely impressive damage to the concrete slab but objectively not sweeping the slab clean somehow seems truly bizarre to me.I’d actually say the contextual damage was enough for EF5. The damage to the concrete slab itself is very impressive too. Again, I think the only thing that keeps it from EF5 is that if we’re going by the “slab swept clean” definition, it doesn’t really apply.
Some post-debris cleanup pics got posted and everyone just started second-guessing, even though it’s the same house as below. Not a clean sweep.
Perhaps take a twitter fast @buckeye05 after outbreaks. Lol i personally avoid usually, I just can’t…This was posted to Twitter with the caption “If this isn’t EF5 then I don’t know what is”. Yeah let’s just ignore that the entire property has essentially been bulldozed into an empty dirt lot with a slab. There’s even a freakin’ bulldozer IN the photo! Weather Twitter raises my blood pressure…
Honestly looking at the position of that bulldozer I wouldn’t be surprised if the damaged/lifted up slab was caused by it.This was posted to Twitter with the caption “If this isn’t EF5 then I don’t know what is”. Yeah let’s just ignore that the entire property has essentially been bulldozed into an empty dirt lot with a slab. There’s even a freakin’ bulldozer IN the photo! Weather Twitter raises my blood pressure…
That’s actually a very distinct possibility.Honestly looking at the position of that bulldozer I wouldn’t be surprised if the damaged/lifted up slab was caused by it.
If we were to blatantly assume the denoted tornadoes are getting upgraded, this outbreak could end up with an extra ef4, two extra ef3s, and one extra ef2; which would end up being 22Ef2/9Ef3/4Ef4 . (Not counting other areas yet to be surveyed)
Used to be extremely liberal with ratings, like to a fault (look at the South Roxanna, IL EF3 of 2013), but seem to have trended bit more conservative as of late.How is St. Louis with ratings?