A march of about 10 supercells…. Thats normal.
A march of about 10 supercells…. Thats normal.
Literally went from almost nothing to semi discrete….WxTwitter goes nuts in 3...2...
Yeah, and 4/27/11 may have had a concern with atmospheric recovery after that morning QLCS, if I’m remembering correctly.For a 60% you would need every single model across the board to consistently agree 2 days at minimum, and all have to agree consistently that the environment has to be extreme and have essentially no failure modes whatsoever.
I don’t know. Either way, I feel like 60% is unnecessary in general; 45% should just become greater than or equal to 45% imo, it should raise the same alarm bells as a 60% does.To add on, their discussion the day of was about a few violent tornadoes possible? If I remember correctly, which a few can be between 3-5? Which would already be a memorable outbreak in itself. If they went with the 60% their verbiage would’ve been much more volatile.
Why?I'm going nuts too. I was not expecting CAMs to do that.
Agreed. A 60% is something that should get people really really thinking about a day. But it’s lost all of its purpose because of that day it was issued.I don’t know. Either way, I feel like 60% is unnecessary in general; 45% should just become greater than or equal to 45% imo, it should raise the same alarm bells as a 60% does.
I was expecting a few more cells. Not a line of completely discrete cells from N TX to N KS and maybe even S NE.Why?
In that environment ahead of them. Yeah that’s scary.I was expecting a few more cells. Not a line of completely discrete cells from N TX to N KS and maybe even S NE.
If this is what models are showing, shouldn’t they extend the MDT more south?Oh crap, I just realized.
View attachment 27709
What's stopping more cells from firing a second time? One cell did in S KS. Something tells me that OK could do the same.
More south and probably a bit more north IMO.If this is what models are showing, shouldn’t they extend the MDT more south?