Central Ohio Wx
Member
It’s more likely debris craters from something being rolled.Some very interesting stuff going on in that last pic. Looks like trenching to me.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It’s more likely debris craters from something being rolled.Some very interesting stuff going on in that last pic. Looks like trenching to me.
Yeah on second glance I think you’re right. There’s clearly quite a bit of clear pock marking visible from debris impacts. I’d say likely multiple objects being thrown, and probably bounced along the ground, as I see multiple linear paths of impact marks.It’s more likely debris craters from something being rolled.
https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lista_de_tornados_no_Brasil_(2025-)# this wikipedia article lists all tornadoes in Brazil from 2025 onwards, there is also another for 1800-2024.Big ask, but would anyone be willing to post a full list of the tornadoes and their ratings from this outbreak? It’s unfortunate that South America doesn’t have an easy to navigate public tornado database like the US, Canada, and Europe.
Edit: Actually never mind, it looks like there is one based on posts from earlier. Gonna have to look into that.
In general, the Civil Defense agencies of each Brazilian state conduct damage assessments, but most of these studies are quite poor since they have little experience dealing with tornadoes.Big ask, but would anyone be willing to post a full list of the tornadoes and their ratings from this outbreak? It’s unfortunate that South America doesn’t have an easy to navigate public tornado database like the US, Canada, and Europe.
Edit: Actually never mind, it looks like there is one based on posts from earlier. Gonna have to look into that.
Video of the Rio Bonito tornado. Large rain-wrapped wedge as one would expect given the radar signature and width of the damage path.
I’m very curious about the specifics of the “extreme damage” that was found. If we get another F5/EF5 rating this year I’m gonna be absolutely floored. This would be the first in South America since San Justo 1973.View attachment 48545
Pretty sure Vitor works with PREVOTs. They’re basically saying that the F4 rating itself is completely justified but they’re also looking at other damage for a potential upgrade.
I'm still in utter disbelief that we have to say "another". 2025 has just been the year of the unexpected all around.If we get another F5/EF5 rating this year I’m gonna be absolutely floored.
Radar data indicated that the supercell that caused the Rio Bonito do Iguaçu tornado recycled after traveling at least about 70 km and produced another intense tornado that struck the rural area of Guarapuava, killing one person. This tornado has been preliminarily rated as an F3. I believe they are currently surveying the rural areas, and stronger damage might be found there. My suspicion is that this second tornado could potentially be upgraded to an F4. Overall, all the local news outlets are focusing only on the city itself, and there are no images yet from the rural zones affected by the tornado.I’m very curious about the specifics of the “extreme damage” that was found. If we get another F5/EF5 rating this year I’m gonna be absolutely floored. This would be the first in South America since San Justo 1973.
The number of victims wasn’t higher because classes had ended for that period about 30 minutes before the tornado, and the church it destroyed was supposed to start a service at 6:30 p.m. (the tornado hit the town around 6 p.m.). So most of the population was inside their homes. There are reports of people being thrown several meters and cars with occupants that flipped over, yet those inside sustained almost no injuries.The fatality to injury ratio with this one is pretty unorthodox. 5 (1 indirect) fatalities and over 800 injuries. Wonder if the sturdier construction prevented a larger number of deaths. The highest end damage also seemed somewhat sporadic in town and likely tied to multiple vortices.
Can anyone verify the accuracy of this? MetSul posted the death toll update on X today, but I’m unclear on if it’s the overall outbreak total, includes non-tornado fatalities, or is just from the Rio Bonito tornado itself.MetSul reports that the death toll has risen to 9 unfortunately.