Kds86z
Member
Yep. Imagine if that was over populated areas..Still blows my mind how intense this supercell was.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yep. Imagine if that was over populated areas..Still blows my mind how intense this supercell was.










Epic pics @CheeselandSkies and thanks for sharing.Man. I was way closer to the start of that EF3 west-northwest of Pratt than I realized or intended to be. Pitch-black on those back roads north of 54/400 out there and most of the lightning was anvil crawlers, not illuminating anything under the base.
This was as I turned north of 54/400 and crossed the same railroad line where the train had just been derailed by the tornado off to the west a short time earlier:
View attachment 46383
View attachment 46384View attachment 46385View attachment 46386View attachment 46387View attachment 46388View attachment 46389View attachment 46390View attachment 46391View attachment 46392
Think this should be eF4 then?Are walled nails not at least 170???? DOD 10 LB is 165, which I assume is for zero anchoring
The DI for that house states that one wall was left standing in the description. This image is likely post-clean up.Think this should be eF4 then?
Raised the wrong thread from the dead!Wrong thread, there's a separate one encompassing the London day:
I'll do the honors since a big chunk of Thursday's risk area is in my back yard.
There are some pattern recognition fundamentals that suggest Thursday has a better chance of verifying a tornado event than 4/28 did. Namely a pronounced negative tilt and a potent LLJ with a more southerly component. Consistency on the general pattern between the GFS, Euro and now NAM has been relatively good. Still some details yet to iron out mainly with timing, which held SPC back from pulling the trigger on a 30% zone.
- CheeselandSkies
- Replies: 2,656
- Forum: General Weather Discussion

Thanks no idea WHY I get these 2 outbreaks mixed up. Close in date I guess.Wrong thread, there's a separate one encompassing the London day:
I'll do the honors since a big chunk of Thursday's risk area is in my back yard.
There are some pattern recognition fundamentals that suggest Thursday has a better chance of verifying a tornado event than 4/28 did. Namely a pronounced negative tilt and a potent LLJ with a more southerly component. Consistency on the general pattern between the GFS, Euro and now NAM has been relatively good. Still some details yet to iron out mainly with timing, which held SPC back from pulling the trigger on a 30% zone.
- CheeselandSkies
- Replies: 2,656
- Forum: General Weather Discussion
Thanks no idea WHY I get these 2 outbreaks mixed up. Close in date I guess.
Wow, that looks like a daytime shot!Since we're here, I'll post yet another frame grab from my GoPro footage during my brief flirtation with the nocturnal Kansas beast.
View attachment 49510
Pretty confident I have the left edge of the Cullison-Iuka tornado here, toward the bottom right behind the irrigation pivot. This was while I was eastbound (view to the north, camera clipped to my partially rolled down driver's side window) on NW 10th Street north-northeast of Cullison at about 10:55-56 PM.
Wow, that looks like a daytime shot!