Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's poorly documented unfortunately but outbreaks in that area are anomalous. Anything that involves beating the so called magnet of the Appalachian Mountains is intriguing. I wonder if some sort of simple thermodynamic combination can help overcome the usual blocking regime over here. 5/2/1929 and June 1944 were the most potent to do this. Not much like them since.I know, I know, I've mentioned this twice already in the thread, but I'd really like to see an in depth analysis of the 5/2/1929 outbreak in Virginia and Maryland! There's just nothing like it since! I have not found anything satisfactory online
If you look at the some of the ERA5 or 20CR data for 5/2/1929, the 500 MB looks similar to yesterday. Except the jet ejection was timed just right, and actually punched, then overlapped the warm sector. Essentially firing the storms as it nosed into the area, then with the energy directly overhead, allowing them to sustain. None of those tornados were very long tracked, but notable for that region, and seem to have fired on the cold front (which didn’t have as extreme gradient across it as yesterday did) so it was probably semi-discrete for a while but then lined out.I know, I know, I've mentioned this twice already in the thread, but I'd really like to see an in depth analysis of the 5/2/1929 outbreak in Virginia and Maryland! There's just nothing like it since! I have not found anything satisfactory online
The reanalysis data on Tornado Archive doesn't work on mobile unfortunately. Is there any other areas i could view it?If you look at the some of the ERA5 or 20CR data for 5/2/1929, the 500 MB looks similar to yesterday. Except the jet ejection was timed just right, and actually punched, then overlapped the warm sector. Essentially firing the storms as it nosed into the area, then with the energy directly overhead, allowing them to sustain. None of those tornados were very long tracked, but notable for that region, and seem to have fired on the cold front (which didn’t have as extreme gradient across it as yesterday did) so it was probably semi-discrete for a while but then lined out.
Your surface low on that day actually was very close to the outbreak area, moving northeast from Cincinnati and was in the Pittsburgh/Cleveland area as the F3s touched down in northern Virginia. That day, like most anomalous events, just had all the right ingredients at the right place and time.
You've been at this consistent AI regime ever since you joined and I respect you for your posts and your model outputs but I've heard this AI is getting smarter a thousand times. True. It has became tough to distinguish AI videos and that's because there's slight incorrect details still there that it hasn't got right yet.
They've said it's the dumbest it will ever be for two years. I don't see exponential growth but small steps. Forecasting is not a perfect thing and it never will be. I'm sorry but this is just plain out AI hyperbole they've been promising.
AI is literally used half the time for fake "Chihuahua rides cars" videos on Facebook because the platform's degraded to slop. And that's what you expect to overtake. Please stop. There's so much variables in weather forecasting AI will not be capable of doing. And if they do, I'll put my words back up my wahoo but I just don't see this vision of AI replacing human forecasting for a while. It can assist but i wouldn't let it do the work for us. That's my general opinion.
At least they are evolving in the same way as us humansIn my personal experience it seems the latest models are actually dumber and more prone to hallucinations than their previous generation.
I think it was you who mentioned the fact that the Mid-Atlantic is simply, well, at the far east of CONUS and as a consequence, the evolution of troughs makes it very rare for major tornado events to happen there. I also believe it was @bckhd2 who queried about the Impenetrable Storm Wall™ at the Georgia/Alabama border, and I must reckon these factors are likely related to both of these phenomena. Watching and looking back on a lot of outbreaks in the Deep South, Georgia's placement in the CONUS almost always has it receiving basically a glancing blow from the best environmental parameters in events, even major ones. We obviously have way more exceptions to the rule than, say, Maryland, but it seems the same general idea stands. In our particular case, the combination of the trusty Appalachian Wedge, being a bit farther removed from best dynamics than Mississippi and Alabama, having systems traversing our area at late hours of the night with notable consistency, and likely additional factors all seem to contribute.I know, I know, I've mentioned this twice already in the thread, but I'd really like to see an in depth analysis of the 5/2/1929 outbreak in Virginia and Maryland! There's just nothing like it since! I have not found anything satisfactory online
Unfortunately, no. It’s the best public recreation of that data, but you have to use desktop of course.The reanalysis data on Tornado Archive doesn't work on mobile unfortunately. Is there any other areas i could view it?
There's a site for this.Something I really wish we could see after events like this is archived CAMs that we can compare side-by-side with actual observed results. I want to see which CAM gets trough orientation correct most often, which shows the OWS best, which nails SRH, MSL pressure and surface wind, CAPE, and which gets shear. It'd be much easier to spot flies in the ointment if we knew, which models were most reliable for each element.
Nitter unfortunately is experiencing certain issues because now you can't check anyone's post history without restarting to their most recent about two pages in. It's a shame because I usually check a lot of people's old posts out to learn new things and figure out new events. "the general public aren't complaining" oh yes they are.I don't know if I should be doing this, but I did some quick searches over on a certain site, and well...
View attachment 52090
Older one, but I'm throwing it in as a free bonus:
View attachment 52091
Yes! It's so interesting. Would love to see a study done on it someday, but I think you've already identified all of the major factors! It's fascinating to me how such relatively short geographic distances can lead to such drastic differences in storm impacts.I think it was you who mentioned the fact that the Mid-Atlantic is simply, well, at the far east of CONUS and as a consequence, the evolution of troughs makes it very rare for major tornado events to happen there. I also believe it was @bckhd2 who queried about the Impenetrable Storm Wall™ at the Georgia/Alabama border, and I must reckon these factors are likely related to both of these phenomena. Watching and looking back on a lot of outbreaks in the Deep South, Georgia's placement in the CONUS almost always has it receiving basically a glancing blow from the best environmental parameters in events, even major ones. We obviously have way more exceptions to the rule than, say, Maryland, but it seems the same general idea stands. In our particular case, the combination of the trusty Appalachian Wedge, being a bit farther removed from best dynamics than Mississippi and Alabama, having systems traversing our area at late hours of the night with notable consistency, and likely additional factors all seem to contribute.