• Welcome to TalkWeather!
    We see you lurking around TalkWeather! Take the extra step and join us today to view attachments, see less ads and maybe even join the discussion.
    CLICK TO JOIN TALKWEATHER

NOAA/NWS Budget Cuts

Due to the cancellation of a cloud services contract, a vast array of NOAA data will become unavailable starting at midnight tonight. NSSL resources will be going down, which will likely impact both SPC operations and forecasts of WFOs that rely on NSSL data.
That sucks big time. Warn On Forecast data will become unavailable (to the general public at least - I imagine there is an alternate means for accessing it inside NOAA/NWS)
 
That sucks big time. Warn On Forecast data will become unavailable (to the general public at least - I imagine there is an alternate means for accessing it inside NOAA/NWS)
Looks like the contract cancellations have been reversed; trying to find additional verification, but obviously would be good news. Anyone who thinks, however, that nothing else problematic has happened with NOAA, needs to take a long look in the mirror and maybe touch grass.
1743795624346.png
 
NWS will no longer be translating crucial weather alerts.

I believe Spann said at one point that a not insignificant contributor to casualties from April 27 came from mainly Spanish-speakers who couldn't discern warning instructions, so this is most unwelcome.
 
I've been seeing a fair number of "why isn't this storm warned when this chaser has it on video" or "why isn't this warning upgraded when X?" and I'd like to remind people of these budget cuts and that the NWS offices are running very understaffed. They are going to do whatever they can to make sure people are safe, but they can't be on top of everything all at once with these large outbreaks when they are missing staff. Upgrading a warning is probably going to take lesser priority than making sure warnings are up in the first place, since most people are only aware of warnings in general, not whether it's radar indicated, observed, or otherwise.

As for tornadoes on streams... Chasers or their support teams need to be calling in reports. This was an issue before the budget cuts, but now those eyes on the ground are absolutely necessary. If chasers want to help protect folks, then they have to make the calls.
 
White House Proposal Could Gut Climate Modeling the World Depends On

NOAA makes its data ⎯ from ocean buoy and satellite readings to the outputs from the GFDL models ⎯ free to the public, where it constitutes a certified base layer of information that is picked up not only by American policymakers, regulators and planners but also by scientists around the world and by industries, which use it to gain a competitive advantage. A 2024 study by the American Meteorological Society found that NOAA’s weather forecasts alone ⎯ which use parts of the GFDL models and represent just a tiny fraction of the agency’s data production ⎯ generate more than $73 in savings for every dollar invested in them.

The article itself goes into all the different areas the GFDL touches. It's a lot.
 
Can anyone explain why the hiring freeze? These offices are badly understaffed and it's not like they are 7 figure salary jobs. Not a place we need to be pinching pennies in my opinion.
 
Here's this:

Screenshot 2025-05-09 9.56.05 AM.png
How are the intensities of the South Indian Ocean cyclones supposed to be classified? The South Atlantic isn't the most active usually so I can kinda understand that, but I feel we still need Dvorak classification for both of those areas.
 
Here's this:

View attachment 41125
How are the intensities of the South Indian Ocean cyclones supposed to be classified? The South Atlantic isn't the most active usually so I can kinda understand that, but I feel we still need Dvorak classification for both of those areas.
At this rate, they'll just send Billy up in a hot air balloon to eyeball it.
 
At this rate, they'll just send Billy up in a hot air balloon to eyeball it.
Next they'll be cutting out the South Pacific...

I have no clue why they are cutting out dvorak for the South Atlantic and the South Indian Ocean.
 
Next they'll be cutting out the South Pacific...

I have no clue why they are cutting out dvorak for the South Atlantic and the South Indian Ocean.
I'm sure it's supposed to be a cost-cutting measure of some sort, although exactly how I'm supposed to look at NOAA discontinuing the use of the Dvorak scale for SIO/SAO and go "wow, this is such a worthwhile act that will save us money!" is one of many questions I have yet to find an actual answer for.
 
I'm sure it's supposed to be a cost-cutting measure of some sort, although exactly how I'm supposed to look at NOAA discontinuing the use of the Dvorak scale for SIO/SAO and go "wow, this is such a worthwhile act that will save us money!" is one of many questions I have yet to find an actual answer for.
Exactly. What is the JTWC supposed to do then? How are they going to rate the intensity of the storms? Are we supposed to do so ourselves?
 
Can anyone explain why the hiring freeze? These offices are badly understaffed and it's not like they are 7 figure salary jobs. Not a place we need to be pinching pennies in my opinion.

The goal is the destruction of NWS as we know it, especially the forecasting parts. By rendering them unable to do their jobs, they can then say, oh, look, this is terrible and "privatize" it. So as long as the current administration is in power, they will do whatever they can to make NWS/NOAA as inefficient as possible.

This was all highlighted in Project 2025 prior to the election. Here's a summary from before the election:

Project 2025 includes about four pages on NOAA and the National Weather Service. That part was written by Thomas F. Gilman, who was an official in Trump’s Commerce Department.

The document describes NOAA as a primary component “of the climate change alarm industry” and said it “should be broken up and downsized.”

...

Project 2025 would not outright end the National Weather Service. It says the agency “should focus on its data-gathering services,” and “should fully commercialize its forecasting operations.”

It said that “commercialization of weather technologies should be prioritized to ensure that taxpayer dollars are invested in the most cost-efficient technologies for high quality research and weather data.” Investing in commercial partners will increase competition, Project 2025 said.

Project 2025 also said the National Weather Service should become a “performance-based organization” held accountable for achieving specific results, even if the head of the agency must “deviate from government rules” to achieve those results.

The administration is using "money-saving" as an excuse. It has very little to do with actual efficiency and much more to do with covering up climate science and also making sure that anything that might have the possibility to make money is in the hands of corporations or private individuals.
 
The goal is the destruction of NWS as we know it, especially the forecasting parts. By rendering them unable to do their jobs, they can then say, oh, look, this is terrible and "privatize" it. So as long as the current administration is in power, they will do whatever they can to make NWS/NOAA as inefficient as possible.

This was all highlighted in Project 2025 prior to the election. Here's a summary from before the election:



The administration is using "money-saving" as an excuse. It has very little to do with actual efficiency and much more to do with covering up climate science and also making sure that anything that might have the possibility to make money is in the hands of corporations or private individuals.
Distant noises of AccuWeather lobbying
 
Back
Top