akt1985
Member
The tornado in that photo looks photoshopped from a waterspout that appeared at night over Lake Ochechobee in National Geographic.That looks fake, and if it isn't then it's not Bloomington; that storm was highly rainwrapped.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The tornado in that photo looks photoshopped from a waterspout that appeared at night over Lake Ochechobee in National Geographic.That looks fake, and if it isn't then it's not Bloomington; that storm was highly rainwrapped.
There’s also a large volume of misinformation out there now during and after events. Which seems to be a recent phenomenon. How many tweets got posted last night of yesterday’s “tornados” that turned out to be from other events or just blatantly fake?Not as bad as it could've been thankfully but regardless still impactful
It's genuinely sickening recording people at their lowest, when they're injured and in bad condition. And even lying about the fact there was nothing wrong assured with it? I've never been a fan of CMSC but this is just even furthering the fact that he's a POS.
Easily; Bloomington was probably low-end EF2 while New Hebron (same tor as Flat Rock) is a possible EF3 candidate.Think flat rock IL was stronger than Bloomington.
Bloomington tornado rated EF2 with 120-mph peak winds.
Yeah, this is why I'm very weary of what I see. During Melissa, there was AI photos going around of the so called destruction when it was just a fake image of a destroyed area. This happened with the Selmer tornado last year with the supposed "death toll", reports came around that at least 7 died when that same person who said it had mixed it up with the 3/31/23 tornado. The amount of fake images going around yesterday after the Bloomington tor were wild. The Internet is not a place where you can easily trust things anymore.There’s also a large volume of misinformation out there now during and after events. Which seems to be a recent phenomenon. How many tweets got posted last night of yesterday’s “tornados” that turned out to be from other events or just blatantly fake?
That’s why. I was confused. All. I saw online were mobile homes damaged.That’s a little surprising. Was expecting EF2 to EF3.
Same, but I think the house mightve not been the one I geolocated (I had 2 images to go off, both were extremely dark) and instead a mobile home to the south of it.That’s a little surprising. Was expecting EF2 to EF3.
About my expectations tbhGuess we’ll squeeze one Ef2 out of this event.
That Long tracker eyThe models are getting better at predicting long-trackers.