gangstonc
Member
I missed it. I’ll go check it and report back.Countries with heavy gun regulation like Mexico, Colombia, Venezuela, Brazil (until recently), El Salvador, Honduras, etc?
I could go on. Most of those countries outright ban private ownership or heavily restrict it. Many of them restrict the type of weapon, magazine size, number of firearms per person, and restrict gun sales to government stores run by the military or police.
I haven't looked recently at the gun homicide rates for those countries, but I almost guarantee you every single one of them is higher than the rate here in the United States -- or at worst -- very comparable.
Most of those countries have huge issues with illegal guns, and therefore the criminals are armed while normal civilians are not.
Some of those countries have a lot of guns in them. It's just virtually all of them are illegal or not registered. Oddly enough, I can't think of any one of those countries that has a problem with mass shooting (Brazil has had a few). Why is that?
Why aren't those countries compared to the United States? Why is it they have fewer overall numbers of guns yet have higher rates of violence and gun deaths? Why is it that even with their strict laws that criminals still have guns?
But you want to know what the major difference is between the United States and other countries? They don't have 350 million+ guns or 330 million people.
You have explicitly said you just want to try stuff until something works. Thats not how liberty and freedom work. That's the antithesis of how to properly make policy. Doing something just to do it is not a serious way to address gun violence and mass shootings.
By the way, I wrote a very detailed post to you earlier covering a number of the policy items you said you'd support. I would appreciate if you'd give it a response.