• Welcome to TalkWeather!
    We see you lurking around TalkWeather! Take the extra step and join us today to view attachments, see less ads and maybe even join the discussion.
    CLICK TO JOIN TALKWEATHER

Archive 2017-2019 Political Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
gangstonc said:
Barr just admitted he had already started working on the statement to clear trump of obstruction before he received the Mueller report. Amazing.
Click to expand...


Kind of like Comey writing Hillary's exoneration letter even before he interviewed her while not under oath!
 
gangstonc said:
Lindsey Graham also said it was “over”. He also admitted to not reading the report.
Click to expand...
Yeah what else is new, Congressmen and Women often Times do not read reports, bills, etc. See Obamacare.

Barr said that Mueller was tasked with either in a finding of or no finding by law. He didn't do either so he broke the law.
 
gangstonc said:
I do. I don’t believe Barr’s “interpretation”. I haven’t found a single error in Mueller’s evidence or conclusions. I have openly supported it and quoted from it on this forum several times.

Have you read it?
Click to expand...

Mueller said he had no problem with Barr's summary of his report. That report was written by crazed Hillary supporters to keep this crap going. A continuation of the witch hunt.
 
Matt said:
Mueller said he had no problem with Barr's summary of his report. That report was written by crazed Hillary supporters to keep this crap going. A continuation of the witch hunt.
Click to expand...
That’s not what Mueller’s letter said. Mueller told Barr that his summary did not capture the report’s “context, nature, and substance.”

Pretty scathing.

Once again, your facts are wrong.
 
gangstonc said:
That’s not what Mueller’s letter said. Mueller told Barr that his summary did not capture the report’s “context, nature, and substance.”

Pretty scathing.

Once again, your facts are wrong.
Click to expand...
Does Barr's summary matter? We have the Mueller report.
 
gangstonc said:
That’s not what Mueller’s letter said. Mueller told Barr that his summary did not capture the report’s “context, nature, and substance.”

Pretty scathing.

Once again, your facts are wrong.
Click to expand...

Nope. There was no collusion and no obstruction or the Hillary loving and Democrat party donors on his investigative team would have demanded the report reflect that. Keep clinging on man.
 
Matt said:
Then why did Mueller, when called by Barr after this letter say he had no problem with his summary ?
Click to expand...
I don’t know the specifics of that phone call.

The letter is king. It’s written word and represents a pretty scathing rebuke in the legal world. Mueller could have just called Barr with his complaints, but instead chose to write the letter so his problems would be on the record. Huge deal.

Why do you believe a characterization of a phone call over a written letter? Why do you argue the contents of a report you have t read?
 
Last edited:
gangstonc said:
I don’t know the specifics of that phone call.

The letter is king. It’s written word and represents a pretty scathing rebuke in the legal world. Mueller could have just called Barr with his complaints, but instead chose to write the letter so his problems would be on the record. Huge deal.

Why do you believe a characterization of a phone call over a written letter? Why do you argue the contents of a report you have t read?
Click to expand...


I believe Barr is an honest man and would not tell a falsehood knowing Mueller could counter his opinion. Why is one more valid than the other ? In fact Barr asked "why the letter'? Why not just pick up the phone? I know this is a tough time for you and you are grasping at any straw that may be available. Hang in their!
 
Matt said:
I believe Barr is an honest man and would not tell a falsehood knowing Mueller could counter his opinion. Why is one more valid than the other ? In fact Barr asked "why the letter'? Why not just pick up the phone? I know this is a tough time for you and you are grasping at any straw that may be available. Hang in their!
Click to expand...
He asked “why the letter” because that makes life tough for him. He knew the letter would be made public and put him in a tough spot. He thought he would be able to exploit his friendship with Mueller and handle things like buddies over the phone with no paper trail. Mueller got him there. He went nuclear.

I’m hanging in there just fine. I’m pretty sure I won’t hang on to this as long as you’ve held on to her emails.

Have you read that report you keep talking about yet?
 
gangstonc said:
That’s not what Mueller’s letter said. Mueller told Barr that his summary did not capture the report’s “context, nature, and substance.”

Pretty scathing.

Once again, your facts are wrong.
Click to expand...


He was upset at the medias reaction to Barr summary. Not that there was anything factually wrong. Mueller was getting skewered and his feelings were hurt. Poor baby!
 
I have a question. Who was President and Vice President during this so called Russian interference and collusion ? What did they do about it ? Why was the Trump campaign not warned as is customary ? I think we all know why!
 
Matt said:
I have a question. Who was President and Vice President during this so called Russian interference and collusion ? What did they do about it ? Why was the Trump campaign not warned as is customary ? I think we all know why!
Click to expand...
We had two bumbling politicians who might have had the worst takes in foreign policy in the last half-century...if not longer.

Whether this was unintentional stupidity or willful stupidity, I can't answer that.



 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top