Was it you who thought he should sit down to an interview? The idea that anyone thought his lawyers should have allowed that is confounding and it says more about liberal talking points than it does about the understanding of law and consequences thereof. If I was Trump's lawyer I would have forbidden him from opening his fat mouth. Under no circumstances would I have allowed him to speak one on one to Robert Mueller given his propensity to inflate, exaggerate, and lie. Because an attorney's job is to protect their client. Even an unlikable one. As for his witten statements, I can't speak to them. I'm sure they took their time with them. Rightfully so. So no, sitting down to an interview quickly doesn't prove what you think it proves. Two things can be true at the same time. Donald Trump can be a dishonable cretin and a corrupt morally bankrupt human being and not be guilty of collusion if he doesn't do what you think he should do.
