That guy changed his Twitter profile picture. It was pretty famously Saul Goodman. I’m not a big fan of him, but I do like seeing Andrew Shearer’s analysis.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That guy changed his Twitter profile picture. It was pretty famously Saul Goodman. I’m not a big fan of him, but I do like seeing Andrew Shearer’s analysis.
People just cherry picking CAMs and posting the SigTor values "LoOk at tHis SigtOr it's over 10 in Minneapolis OMG!" without additional context is so cringe.
It’s not that he’s no good, but he cherry picks soundings and certain model runs. He’s also not actually a meteorologist, but merely a hobbyist/enthusiast like us here. That doesn’t make his opinion any less valid, but he’s someone that’s quick to do the “major outbreak” and then an hour into an event “Bu$t” cycle. He’s just not someone that’s in my go to for weather analysis.He no good?
Not to mention the higher STP values are partially influenced by the cap itself, since the moisture never condensates, the CAPE increases without being used, etc.lol yeah for sure, STP doesn’t matter if storms don’t form etc..
It reminds me of the event last year (I really can’t recall the exact date) but everyone on Twitter was posting screenshots of the violent tornado parameter being maxed out around southern Oklahoma and North Texas. Ironically, one of them was that StarInBox guy mentioned above. There were zero storms in the area though. It does no good to have maxed out parameters or high STP values if a discrete supercell isn’t there to take advantage of it. It’s just eye candy.Not to mention the higher STP values are partially influenced by the cap itself, since the moisture never condensates, the CAPE increases without being used, etc.
I actually genuinely never knew that. Good to know!Not to mention the higher STP values are partially influenced by the cap itself, since the moisture never condensates, the CAPE increases without being used, etc.
It’s not that he’s no good, but he cherry picks soundings and certain model runs. He’s also not actually a meteorologist, but merely a hobbyist/enthusiast like us here. That doesn’t make his opinion any less valid, but he’s someone that’s quick to do the “major outbreak” and then an hour into an event “Bu$t” cycle. He’s just not someone that’s in my go to for weather analysis.
At the school I go too, I get compared to Reed all the time because of how quirky I can be lol. Probably tmi, but thought it would be funny to share.I do enjoy Reed’s streams, and his passion for meteorology and tornados is one of a kind. I really don’t know of anyone else in human history who has personally seen as many tornados as he has. However, he can be goofy at times and his quirks can be funny, which we all point out lol. The man can chase tornados and sniff them out like no one else.
My opinion of him has evolved over time. I wasn’t a big fan of young Reed, such as the college version of himself in the documentary “Tornado Glory”. I also didn’t think highly of his behavior on Storm chasers. I feel like he was a jack @$s to his teammates and drivers, especially Joel. I am curious how much of those disagreements were manufactured at the urging of television producers and they were playing more extreme versions of their real personalities. I think the tv show really brought a lot of negative opinions out about him.
I am a fan of the current quirky version of Reed though. He still has that same passion, but really does seem to be a nice guy and everyone that has met him all say he is quite nice. He’s just doing the standard American male process of aging where he goes from the swashbuckling cowboy in his 20s to a more mellowed out quirky version in his 40s.
That's a consistent modus operandi of any number of posters here though.People just cherry picking CAMs and posting the SigTor values "LoOk at tHis SigtOr it's over 10 in Minneapolis OMG!" without additional context is so cringe.
I mean, if you’re going to do that, then name names. We really don’t see that here very often. Usually when someone does post an STP plot it’s to accentuate a larger point on a setup. If someone does do it, they are usually explained about STP works and how it requires storms to be present In the first place.That's a consistent modus operandi of any number of posters here though.
Weird post, oddly aggressive. Chill broI mean, if you’re going to do that, then name names. We really don’t see that here very often. Usually when someone does post an STP plot it’s to accentuate a larger point on a setup. If someone does do it, they are usually explained about STP works and how it requires storms to be present In the first place.
From what i’ve seen, it’s truly an all or nothing day.Anyway about tomorrow, the 00z models didn't help clarify the situation at all. I have no idea what's going to happen tomorrow. Good luck SPC!
Lol…. what?Weird post, oddly aggressive. Chill bro
From what i’ve seen, it’s truly an all or nothing day.
Yeah, no. Simply asking someone to further elaborate on a cheap dig attempt at some users on here isn’t aggressive. If you have an issue with my post, my DMs are open.Weird post, oddly aggressive. Chill bro