Worth noting 04/14/12 was also a Saturday. I'm of the belief issuing the high risk while people are still at the office, and have a higher chance of hearing about it through word of mouth is a wise decision. Been seeing way too many anecdotes in here today about the general public still not being aware of what's coming. I'm sure cancelling the St. Patty's day parade and other events is helping to convey the seriousness of the situation.Only two day two highs have been issued before (for 4/7/06 and 4/14/12) - always possible, but they've got to have exceptional confidence to do it before the D1
Spann said that???? Wow! He's very conservative with weather events usuallyJames Spann saying that this will probably be upgraded to high risk, and that this is an event that happens "once every few years". Wow.
This is going to be ugly…
>tfw the NAM is more discrete than the HRRR
That includes us folks here around Austin. We're supposed to have gusts up to 35 to 40 miles an hour.also a massive extremely critical fire area on the backside of this system in TX/OK tomorrow
Hm NAM's sometime the one that picks up a couple of fail modes on these huge setups, too.Absolutely hate how it maintains this broken-apart look as it tracks into East AL and West GA. And this is the NAM. Also, the helicity is just absurd. Jimmies status is definitely rustled.
View attachment 35347View attachment 35348
That’s how you can tell that the juxtaposition of the jet streak supports a discrete mode even without having to look at vertical wind profiles.Absolutely hate how it maintains this broken-apart look as it tracks into East AL and West GA. And this is the NAM. Also, the helicity is just absurd. Jimmies status is definitely rustled.
View attachment 35347View attachment 35348