Whenever I keep looking at soundings in Alabama on the supercell sounding analogue systems; December 16, 2000 keeps popping up.
James spann remembers that event well.
James spann remembers that event well.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
18Z GFS sounding from Saturday afternoon from North-Central MS.
View attachment 35059
Yeah none of these analogs and soundings are something you wanna see.View attachment 35065
omg, Southern MS......
yup, May 2003 was a huge ahh outbreak sequence that lasted a week, this is only like 2 days, but that as an analog is rather alarmingYeah none of these analogs and soundings are something you wanna see.
Lots of may 2003 and repeated December 16 2000 when looking at soundings in Alabama.Yeah none of these analogs and soundings are something you wanna see.
Seems like CAPE has been underdone by some in the past. If that is the case again we're gonna have big problemsThis is nuts coming from a Global model at 96 hours...wonder how much the CAMs will handle the thermodynamics. With shear and helicity this high, any additional CAPE will simply increase the ceiling and the area under threat.
So I did a thing using this sounding. My background and work is in Statistics (I have a Master's in it, and I'm a Senior Data Scientist), so the SARS Sounding Analog in the Sharppy-based soundings intrigues me. So I dug into how they are created. It turns out the analogs are ALL deterministic, meaning it takes a few variables from the sounding (like ML CAPE) and goes plus or minus 100 is a match, etc. So it's a very rough and crude technique to find analogs. Instead, I wanted to take a different approach.
Just your typical sub 990 mb low during March in Tennessee, nothing to look atI've nothing good to say about this: 987 mb secondary low over Nashville at 21Z
View attachment 35067
I can honestly see those being verified as of now with this setup. This thing is on the cusp of looking like a upper-echelon type of outbreak.Lots of may 2003 and repeated December 16 2000 when looking at soundings in Alabama.
wow, really cool and terrifyingSo I did a thing using this sounding. My background and work is in Statistics (I have a Master's in it, and I'm a Senior Data Scientist), so the SARS Sounding Analog in the Sharppy-based soundings intrigues me. So I dug into how they are created. It turns out the analogs are ALL deterministic, meaning it takes a few variables from the sounding (like ML CAPE) and goes plus or minus 100 is a match, etc. So it's a very rough and crude technique to find analogs. Instead, I wanted to take a different approach.
So I took the entire SARS supercell tornado database off its Github and ran it through some statistics. Then I took the sounding above as a guinea pig and plugged its parameters into the model. My model uses Mahalanobis distance and k-nearest neighbors to find the 10 closest matches statistically to each sounding's variables.
For anyone curious, this returned the 10 closest soundings ---> 40% had EF2+ tornadoes and 60% were tornadic. Very strong indications of the atmosphere we may face on Saturday.
Without a doubt I think we’ll see an EF2+ tornado in terms of intensity. Just hope that doesn’t verify.So I did a thing using this sounding. My background and work is in Statistics (I have a Master's in it, and I'm a Senior Data Scientist), so the SARS Sounding Analog in the Sharppy-based soundings intrigues me. So I dug into how they are created. It turns out the analogs are ALL deterministic, meaning it takes a few variables from the sounding (like ML CAPE) and goes plus or minus 100 is a match, etc. So it's a very rough and crude technique to find analogs. Instead, I wanted to take a different approach.
So I took the entire SARS supercell tornado database off its Github and ran it through some statistics. Then I took the sounding above as a guinea pig and plugged its parameters into the model. My model uses Mahalanobis distance and k-nearest neighbors to find the 10 closest matches statistically to each sounding's variables.
For anyone curious, this returned the 10 closest soundings ---> 40% had EF2+ tornadoes and 60% were tornadic. Very strong indications of the atmosphere we may face on Saturday.
Still some questions marks, get about two days out from the event and I think we can start to gauge the caliber of the event better. It definitely doesn't look good though.I can honestly see those being verified as of now with this setup. This thing is on the cusp of looking like a upper-echelon type of outbreak.