gangstonc
Member
The key issue with Hickabee’s story is that you can’t ask another country for help. He needed to go to the FBI.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
The key issue with Hickabee’s story is that you can’t ask another country for help. He needed to go to the FBI.
And the memo trump released is horrible.We have a memo. Not a verbatim transcript. Feel that is very important fact.
The key issue with Hickabee’s story is that you can’t ask another country for help. He needed to go to the FBI.
And the memo trump released is horrible.
Do you have more examples of Trump asking a foreign nation to investigate somebody for corruption?He is more than within his right to ask for help looking into corruption by Americans in Ukraine. In fact he is obligated. He did say he would have the AG get in touch. We've been over this before.
Do you have more examples of Trump asking a foreign nation to investigate somebody for corruption?
There is interest. The FBI should investigate him. Not Trump, his lawyers, and other countries.The legal division of The Justice Dept. said the call was not illegal. Why is there no interest from all you never Trumpers as to why would Burisma hire Hunter Biden for at least $50K per month(perhaps more) ? And this was shortly after he flew with his daddy to Ukraine.
Yes we have. And you still don’t get it.He is more than within his right to ask for help looking into corruption by Americans in Ukraine. In fact he is obligated. He did say he would have the AG get in touch. We've been over this before.
There is interest. The FBI should investigate him. Not Trump, his lawyers, and other countries.
Here is how things work in Trump’s doj:
Why does that matter? If the complaint is legitimate, it doesn’t matter who the whistleblower knows or is associated with. However, it does once again prove that your argument during the 2016 election that Trump would use his incredible business savvy to fill the White House with the best and brightest to help him was completely wrong.Adam Piece Of Schiff, you tried.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...professional-tie-to-2020-democratic-candidate
It was that he had a significant tie to one of the Democratic presidential candidates currently vying to challenge President Trump in next year's election.
Why does that matter? If the complaint is legitimate, it doesn’t matter who the whistleblower knows or is associated with. However, it does once again prove that your argument during the 2016 election that Trump would use his incredible business savvy to fill the White House with the best and brightest to help him was completely wrong.
It’s not a transcript. And even it contains evidence of quid pro quo.It's not legit. Read the transcript. And it is important. Why don't they release his identity so he or she can be fully vetted. I am quite sure they have scrubbed his social media sites.
It’s not a transcript. And even it contains evidence of quid pro quo.
Whistleblowers are protected by law! The person’s report has been deemed credible, and has now been backed by multiple news stories, leaks, and Giuliani himself.
It’s not a transcript. And even it contains evidence of quid pro quo.
Whistleblowers are protected by law! The person’s report has been deemed credible, and has now been backed by multiple news stories, leaks, and Giuliani himself.
Why was the congressionally appropriated aid withheld?No Quid Pro Quo. Asking a foreign government to look into possible corruption by U.S. VP is not a quid pro quo. It is his job.
Why was the congressionally appropriated aid withheld?
notice in the “transcript” trumps use of the word “favor”.