Casuarina Head
Member
@JPWX Yet in the italicised you just did, unless my eyes deceive me. If my post did not merit a response, then what is the point of further discussion?I don't think I have to explain myself or my thoughts. The January's I listed are the only ones where a tropical storm or greater DID NOT form in the western Pacific. I was making a observation on the lack of western Pacific activity thus far and THERE is a teleconnection of lack of western Pacific activity leading to greater activity in the Atlantic. I'm so sorry I didn't mention your list of years. I do my research and present my thoughts. That means I use and choose my own years that match up with current ENSO pattern.
At any rate, I was only mentioning that, to me at least, I did not see a correlation in terms of “hyperactive” ACE (you may be looking at named storms in both basins, and a correlation may well be apparent there). Based on your list of years, I do not see a strong correlation between the absence of West-Pacific storms in January and seasonal hyperactivity ACE-wise in the Atlantic. Personally, I consider ACE to be more meaningful an indicator in terms of how severe a season is, given that I feel the number of named storms in the Atlantic has been inflated since standards for classification were lowered by the early 2000s, thereby feeding certain narratives about climate change and TC activity that I find to be misleading.
If I am not mistaken, you could be correct in terms of named storms, and I could be correct in terms of ACE. We might be looking at different sides of the same problem.