tornado examiner
Member
Anyone know if there’s satellite imagery or helicopter imagery coming out for rolling fork?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Wow so they're actually is a slim chance of it being a ef5. Bringing in another damage assessor?
They have to have multiple ef5 markers if I'm correct...? to be able to give it a ef5 ranking, doubt it happens but surprised at the slim chance of a ef5 rating.
@buckeye05 would know that answer.
I don’t think it necessarily means they are considering EF5 ratings - you just need a QRT to go above an EF3 rating.Wow so they're actually is a slim chance of it being a ef5. Bringing in another damage assessor?
They have to have multiple ef5 markers if I'm correct...? to be able to give it a ef5 ranking, doubt it happens but surprised at the slim chance of a ef5 rating.
@buckeye05 would know that answer.
Is it that they plan on doing a good job?The fact that they are considering bringing in another survey team tells me a LOT.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I mean if you read the post yes it does. There's definite ef4 damage so bringing in another team to make sure it's just ef4 I guess instead of into the ef5.I don’t think it necessarily means they are considering EF5 ratings - you just need a QRT to go above an EF3 rating.
Also, only one EF5 DI is necessary for an EF5 rating. Needing more than one was just the terrible excuse the NWS used to keep Vilonia at EF4 rating in 2014.
Quick question on that - Bassfield 2020, was the well constructed, anchored cabin that was slabbed rated EF4? I think there’s been some talk that a singular house can’t actually be rated “EF5” that it requires contextual evidenceI don’t think it necessarily means they are considering EF5 ratings - you just need a QRT to go above an EF3 rating.
Also, only one EF5 DI is necessary for an EF5 rating. Needing more than one was just the terrible excuse the NWS used to keep Vilonia at EF4 rating in 2014.
I think the main reason for Bassfield not being rated EF5 at that cabin was because there was a lack of high end context (no scouring, minor debarking iirc) and because apparently a truck impacted the structure directly (I don’t know how that could be exactly confirmed though). I still reckon if the slabbed homes at Bremen or the damage at Vilonia where surveyed under NWS Jackson, they might have rated it higher - though of course that is speculation as there is no real way of telling. At least the survey will be thorough (hopefully!) unlike some others in the last decade or so…Quick question on that - Bassfield 2020, was the well constructed, anchored cabin that was slabbed rated EF4? I think there’s been some talk that a singular house can’t actually be rated “EF5” that it requires contextual evidence